VirtualBox crash

igallart · 2010-08-28 12:06:00

Hello, I have a problem since that VirtualBox-ose x86_64 is in community, and is that it no work with none SO. When you start the virtual machine, few seconds show an error and stops.

Error

Any idea?

Last edited by igallart (2010-08-28 13:50:04)

igallart · 2010-08-28 19:41:49

It seems that I am not the only one that happens.

http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic. … 72&start=0

wonder · 2010-08-28 19:53:53

just for my curiosity, can you paste the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo ?

igallart · 2010-08-28 20:28:48

wonder wrote:

just for my curiosity, can you paste the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo ?

cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5450 @ 1.66GHz
stepping : 13
cpu MHz : 1662.718
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm
bogomips : 3326.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5450 @ 1.66GHz
stepping : 13
cpu MHz : 1662.718
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 1
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 1
initial apicid : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm
bogomips : 3326.53
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

wonder · 2010-08-28 20:41:25

ok, your cpu doesn't have hardware virtualization. can you enable multilib repo and install lib32-gcc-libs?

igallart · 2010-08-28 20:45:23

wonder wrote:

ok, your cpu doesn't have hardware virtualization. can you enable multilib repo and install lib32-gcc-libs?

I have enable multilib and install lib32-gcc-libs.

Nom : lib32-gcc-libs
Versió : 4.5.1-6
URL : http://gcc.gnu.org
Llicències : GPL LGPL custom
Grups : Cap
Proporciona : Cap
Depen de : lib32-glibc>=2.12.1 gcc-libs>=4.5.1-1
Dep opcionals : Cap
Requerit per : gcc-libs-multilib lib32-db lib32-gnutls lib32-pcre
nspluginwrapper
Conflictes amb : Cap
Substitueix : Cap
Mida instal. : 6128,00 K
Empaquetador : Jan "heftig" Steffens <jan.steffens@gmail.com>
Arquitectura : x86_64
Data de constr.: dv 27 ago 2010 20:09:50 CEST
Data instal. : ds 28 ago 2010 04:42:26 CEST
Raó instal. : Instal·lat com a dependència d'una altre paquet
Script instal. : No
Descripció : Runtime libraries shipped by GCC for C and C++ languages
(32-bit)

If it helps, virtualbox-bin of AUR yes worked well.

wonder · 2010-08-28 20:47:27

ok, i'm waiting the oracles guy to reply as i don't have any clues. here is working fine

cookiecaper · 2010-08-28 22:41:51

Out of curiosity, why are you using OSE? Ideological purity? The PUEL edition is free for individual use.

igallart · 2010-08-29 12:53:02

cookiecaper wrote:

Out of curiosity, why are you using OSE? Ideological purity? The PUEL edition is free for individual use.

For convenience of being at the repositories and perhaps also by ideology as you said. Anyway, the question is that in some specific cases, the program does not work.

Vamp898 · 2010-08-29 19:56:51

Also the OSE Version integrates much better in the Desktop. The PUEL Version seems to take the default look of Qt4 and look like an Alien in the end...

also the OSE Version is in the official stable repository and the PUEL Version in the Unsupported User Repository

at least a lot of people maybe dont need the PUEL Features so why should they take the Unsupported AUR Version which looks like an Alien?

jalu · 2010-09-06 01:40:55

Hello all,

Has there been any progress on this? Virtualbox seems to be completely unusable with x86_64, at least if everyone on x86_64 is experiencing the bug that igallart describes and I can confirm.

phercek · 2010-09-06 07:32:43

I have this problem too, but it is there only when I have amd-v/svm disabled in bios. Try to enable Secure Virtual Machine in bios. It may help you until it is resolved.

wonder · 2010-09-06 07:43:28

not yet, the oracle guys are not very helpful and i first want to be sure that is not my fault before asking for help in mailing list.

my guesses are that is a gcc 4.5. issue. i tried to build myself a gcc 4.4 toolchain and i sucked

rent0n · 2010-09-14 15:45:47

Same problem here. I would suggest trying ask in the mailing lists, I'm sure they will be very helpful.
Switching back to PUEL for the time being.
Keep us posted!

Raphael · 2010-09-15 19:11:04

Same bug here

Log : http://pastebin.com/GeRqpNk4
Cpuinfo : http://pastebin.com/bTDpFWrS

wonder · 2010-10-05 21:10:20

this issue should be fixed in 3.2.8-4.

i got help from Frank Mehnert and we debug together this issue. kudos!

Last edited by wonder (2010-10-05 21:10:29)

jalu · 2010-10-05 23:09:02

Awesome, thanks. I'll try it out and report back later.

Just out of curiosity, what was the problem?

wonder · 2010-10-05 23:16:03

jalu wrote:

Awesome, thanks. I'll try it out and report back later.
Just out of curiosity, what was the problem?

It turns out that the VMMGC.gc module contained SSE code, in translation, wrong gcc flag is activated by default when compiling 32 bit stuff.

jalu · 2010-10-08 01:22:13

Sorry for the bad news, but whenever I try to start one of my VMs, my machine either locks up or reboots... :-(

wonder · 2010-10-08 08:12:44

jalu wrote:

Sorry for the bad news, but whenever I try to start one of my VMs, my machine either locks up or reboots... :-(

recompile the modules

Nichollan · 2010-10-08 08:37:43

Because of that error message, I am currently using QEMU instead. Found it relatively uncomplicated without much graphical deterrence.

Arch Linux

#1 2010-08-28 12:06:00

VirtualBox crash

#2 2010-08-28 19:41:49

Re: VirtualBox crash

#3 2010-08-28 19:53:53

Re: VirtualBox crash

#4 2010-08-28 20:28:48

Re: VirtualBox crash

#5 2010-08-28 20:41:25

Re: VirtualBox crash

#6 2010-08-28 20:45:23

Re: VirtualBox crash

#7 2010-08-28 20:47:27

Re: VirtualBox crash

#8 2010-08-28 22:41:51

Re: VirtualBox crash

#9 2010-08-29 12:53:02

Re: VirtualBox crash

#10 2010-08-29 19:56:51

Re: VirtualBox crash

#11 2010-09-06 01:40:55

Re: VirtualBox crash

#12 2010-09-06 07:32:43

Re: VirtualBox crash

#13 2010-09-06 07:43:28

Re: VirtualBox crash

#14 2010-09-14 15:45:47

Re: VirtualBox crash

#15 2010-09-15 19:11:04

Re: VirtualBox crash

#16 2010-10-05 21:10:20

Re: VirtualBox crash

#17 2010-10-05 23:09:02

Re: VirtualBox crash

#18 2010-10-05 23:16:03

Re: VirtualBox crash

#19 2010-10-08 01:22:13

Re: VirtualBox crash

#20 2010-10-08 08:12:44

Re: VirtualBox crash

#21 2010-10-08 08:37:43

Re: VirtualBox crash

Board footer