You are not logged in.
I have the latest downloadable version of arch and there is no option I can see to put in "ide-legacy".
Last edited by Never (2010-10-10 06:57:55)
Offline
At your own risk:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Kde#KDE_Legacy
Offline
At your own risk:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Kde#KDE_Legacy
I think OP asks about IDE drives :-)
@ Never
You may need an older installation image: ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/iso/
Last edited by karol (2010-09-30 03:02:49)
Offline
I have that, it is giving me issue when I try to pacman. Guess I can keep trying stuff.
Offline
I have that, it is giving me issue when I try to pacman. Guess I can keep trying stuff.
Please be more specific:
- which image are you using
- what errors are you encountering - post the error messages - and when does it happen
Offline
I don't know what the image is, it is old, text based and lets me type arch "ide-legacy" to start the install, since a regular install will fail to get to the installer without it. It has no partitioning options for setting /var or /usr like in the wiki.
The error occurs when I am updating the system, bunch of stuff to pull down, then it says that I should update pacman first, I agree and then the system says
error: error while reading package: Unrecognized archive format: Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character
error: failed to commit transaction (libarchive error)
I try and do a direct pacman of libarchive nad the same thing happens
Offline
This must be a really old pacman that doesn't know about .pkg.tar.xz files.
Edit: What is this legacy IDE thing we're talkig about?
Last edited by fsckd (2010-09-30 04:19:41)
aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies
Offline
Indeed, which is why I wanted to know how you enabled the "ide-legacy" option on newer builds, since all I need to do with the old one is arch "ide-legacy" at the prompt and I am off and away. It would solve the problem, I have been reading about the libarchive issue on these forms, doesn't sound easily solved.
Offline
Edit: What is this legacy IDE thing we're talkig about?
The version of pacman I have lets me install on IDE hard drives. Without that option, the install won't generate, the newer install doesn't seem to have the option at all.
Offline
Do you mean PATA? I have a PATA drive and I was able to install to it fine a few months ago. (Sorry I'm a bit ignorant about this. I'm just wondering why the installer would not be able to handle it.)
aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies
Offline
no I mean IDE.
Offline
The big gray cable hard drives
Offline
Oh, the really, really old stuff. Sorry.
Edit: Sorry, I'm confusing myself, I have a grey cable too. ^^
Last edited by fsckd (2010-09-30 04:30:12)
aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies
Offline
The big gray cable hard drives
Did you try with a regular installer?
aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies
Offline
I installed from a CD, the newer version of arch linux doesn't seem to accept "ide-legacy" as a variable for installation.
Edit: missed that "n't" cause I am tired and repeating things that I have already posted. On what appears to be along standing issue with anyone who has a build pre a certain period.
Last edited by Never (2010-09-30 04:48:12)
Offline
So problem solved?
aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies
Offline
**blink**
Offline
Lol, sorry, I guessed as much.
Last edited by fsckd (2010-09-30 04:56:40)
aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies
Offline
I have the latest downloadable version of arch and there is no option I can see to put in "ide-legacy".
Why do you want to use the old legacy ide driver instead of libata?
Your cdrom etc should work just fine with the libata driver.
And have you tried the new archboot images?
Anyway, you can boot with ide-legacy,but you will have to edit the boot line yourself.
Last edited by Mr.Elendig (2010-09-30 10:36:20)
Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest
Offline
Why do you want to use the old legacy ide driver instead of libata?
Your cdrom etc should work just fine with the libata driver.
And have you tried the new archboot images?
Anyway, you can boot with ide-legacy,but you will have to edit the boot line yourself.
I don't know what libata is, I need the "IDE-legacy" option because I am installing on IDE hard drives, when I let any installer run without the option, the installer won't load, it freezes. The older build, I think it is Don't Panic, states how to start the install with that option enabled, the newer one does not. I am sure there is a way to edit the install parameters to make the latest build of arch linux install on IDE legacy, however, the build does not state how and no one seems to know how.
Offline
Download one of the archboot isos, and switch with tab to edit mode in boot screen add ide-legay at the end and it will be used.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=105927
Official isos don't support ide-legacy boot option
Offline
i have IDE disks and newest arch' and no problems.
Offline
There are still controllers out there that don't work with libata well, those need the old ide subsystem.
Offline
Download one of the archboot isos, and switch with tab to edit mode in boot screen add ide-legay at the end and it will be used.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=105927
Official isos don't support ide-legacy boot option
Thank you very much for this. I can get the install to start running but have alot more options than the build I had before. I have 3 IDE HDs: 80 GBs, 120 GBs, and 160 GBs. The system made me put bios_grub partitions on each drive that was about 1MB [not sure if I was using parted right but it seemed to have no issue], on the 80 GB I wanted to create a 100 MB boot partition and make the rest of the drive a prime. I made whole partitions of the 120 GB and 160 GB drives. I used the raid utility to make a linear raid of the prime partition left on on the 80 and the 120 and 160 drives. Then I used LVM. I created a volume I called root, one called home and a swap.
After the packages I tried to install the bootloader, on that part of the 80GB I had set aside outside of the raid/LVM area. I choose grub2 it didn't work. I'll keep at it but I wanted to know if anyone had any suggestions for how I should set up my drives and an optimal way or example to use RAID and LVM. Thank you.
Offline
Do you really need RAID and LVM? LVM on its own would do what you describe.
Offline