You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I have a 233 gig hard drive so I was thinking of something like this...
Boot - 200 megs - ext2
/ - 15 gigs - ext4
/home - 30 gigs -ext4
/swap - 2 gigs -swap
/var - 10 gigs -ReiserFS
/tmp - 5 gigs -ReiserFS or ext4 (not sure)
/windows - 20 gigs -NTFS (need some windows programs to work that wine doesn't like)
/storage -150 gigs - ext4 (Movies, music, ect.)
Does that look about right, or am I missing something?
Thanks.
Offline
Sure, it looks fine. You probably won't even need 50M for /boot, nevermind 200M, but other than that go ahead.
Offline
i'm using 3 partitions, the first one for windows, the second one is a lvm volume where all my linux "partitions" reside (boot 100mb, swap 2Gb, root 10GB, var 5GB and tmp 5GB, home 10GB) and the third one is for all my data.
i would personally go with one filesystem (in this case ext4 for all my partitions, or btrfs and ext4 for boot)
Offline
Will Windows be happy with only 20 GB? ;P Are you using WinXP or Win7?
Offline
windows xp will be happy with 20gb as long as you don't run any software which needs lots of free space but my windows7 installation with a really basic setup and starcraft 2 (12GB) has almost 30GB
Offline
you don't need a separate boot partition unless you plan to use it for multiple installations. I just keep my /boot under root as the Arch grub has been patched to boot from ext4. If you plan to use grub2, then it has support for ext4 as well.
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots !
Offline
Pages: 1