You are not logged in.
hello,
today i found out that my samsung printer prints texts just fine but the colour of pictures is inverted. here's a printed and then scanned example:
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
the printer is shared and the effect is the same when the print is initiated from a remote host.
cups-usblp 1.4.4-4
splix 2.0.0-7
anyone else experiences this problem? thank you,
jose
update: test page seems okay. so maybe this problem only affects printing bitmaps
Last edited by jose1711 (2010-10-25 17:23:14)
Offline
I have the same problem with samsung ml-2010
Offline
thank you. it's good hearing that i'm not alone in this. i suppose it stopped working "at some point" after upgrade..
Offline
Hello.
I have the same problem with samsung ML-2015.
Images that were pasted in OOo Writer printed fine.
Master of Science in Applied Mathematics
Offline
Hello.
I have the same problem with samsung ML-2015.
Images that were pasted in OOo Writer printed fine.
which is most likely because OOo Writer converts them to vectors. is there a bug report already?
Offline
which is most likely because OOo Writer converts them to vectors. is there a bug report already?
It is look like no such a bug report done already. But I can make a bug report.
Master of Science in Applied Mathematics
Offline
Same problem for me with Samsung ml-2010. For example I can't print any maps from "google maps" anymore. They are printed with inverted colors. Looks awfull.
Switching back to the foomatic/gdi driver solves the problem. But these drivers are not as good as the splix drivers.
Did anyone file a bug report?
Offline
Found the package that causes this problem. Just downgraded ghostscript to "ghostscript-8.71-3". Everything works again. Hopefully this is not an incompatibility between splix 2.0 and ghostscript 9.0
Offline
Hello.
I made the bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21524?o … ed%5B0%5D=
Master of Science in Applied Mathematics
Offline
Same for me on Arch64 with splix and a Samsung ML-2010
The Bug report is marked as a Duplicate from FS#21388 but for me it seems not the same..
I can Print from all applications but Pictures print as negatives.
Downgrading ghostscript solve the problem, but causes dependency errors.
It depends shurly on ghostscript update but not on a PDF problem.
Cancel me not -- for what then shall remain?
Abscissas, some mantissas, modules, modes, A root or two, a torus and a node:
The inverse of my verse, a null domain.
-- Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad
Offline
I can confirm the same thing happening to my samsung ML-2510 with the same fix working. Thanks!
Offline
I experience the same behaviour. I have OKI B410d printer, using OKI's own driver, available as AUR package:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38047
Everything is fine with ghostscript 8.71-3, upgrading to 9.00-1 causes images in PDF files to be printed
in negative. I thought it was a problem with my .tex files or pdflatex or png files themselves.
PDF files that contain png images with transparency cause the entire page to be negative.
Without transparency just the png file is negative. JPG files are negative as well, converting between png, eps and pdf
formats doesn't help either. I even tried taking a screenshot of a png image
Creating a negative png image, putting it in the .tex document and printing that results in correct printout
(the same as when original image and ghostscript 8.71 is used).
I have also tried using different drivers, for example ljet4 works fine, without
negative images, but it stops working after the first printout - all I get is some garbage on the paper.
Here is the bug report in ghostscript's bugtracker: http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691759
Also, the bug report created by Genuine was closed as a duplicate of this one: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21388
Last edited by sjakub (2010-11-09 05:45:43)
Offline
Another workaround for samsung printers: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31764
Offline
Another workaround for samsung printers: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31764
For me with an Samsung ML-2010 driver does not work.
When printing i got only printer internal errorpage that says "INTERNAL ERROR - Please use proper driver"...
Cancel me not -- for what then shall remain?
Abscissas, some mantissas, modules, modes, A root or two, a torus and a node:
The inverse of my verse, a null domain.
-- Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad
Offline
kfgz wrote:Another workaround for samsung printers: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31764
For me with an Samsung ML-2010 driver does not work.
When printing i got only printer internal errorpage that says "INTERNAL ERROR - Please use proper driver"...
works great for me ML-2010 ...
Offline
killajoe wrote:kfgz wrote:Another workaround for samsung printers: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31764
For me with an Samsung ML-2010 driver does not work.
When printing i got only printer internal errorpage that says "INTERNAL ERROR - Please use proper driver"...works great for me ML-2010 ...
I use the printer on a Printserver may this caus the error.. i test it know
Last edited by killajoe (2010-11-18 20:53:08)
Cancel me not -- for what then shall remain?
Abscissas, some mantissas, modules, modes, A root or two, a torus and a node:
The inverse of my verse, a null domain.
-- Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad
Offline
Cosmin wrote:killajoe wrote:For me with an Samsung ML-2010 driver does not work.
When printing i got only printer internal errorpage that says "INTERNAL ERROR - Please use proper driver"...works great for me ML-2010 ...
I use the printer on a Printserver may this caus the error.. i test it know
Also not working for me. The Printer is connected to a print server. I can print, but everytime I get the same page with the mentioned error message.
Offline
Same with Printer directly on usb connection.. "INTERNAL ERROR - Please use proper driver"...
@Cosmin: arch 64 or 32 Bit??
Cancel me not -- for what then shall remain?
Abscissas, some mantissas, modules, modes, A root or two, a torus and a node:
The inverse of my verse, a null domain.
-- Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad
Offline
32 Bit
Offline
32 Bit
Hmm might be related to architecture. I have a 64bit archlinux installation. In fact it would be great if they could fix ghostscript. I love Splix driver.
Offline
Yes i am too on arch 64 but test it on a i686 results too in negative image:
Last edited by killajoe (2010-11-26 09:40:51)
Cancel me not -- for what then shall remain?
Abscissas, some mantissas, modules, modes, A root or two, a torus and a node:
The inverse of my verse, a null domain.
-- Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad
Offline
HP 1018
Rename old ghostscript-8.71-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz into ghostscript-9.00-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz and install it with "pacman -U". It is some kind of deceit but don't judge me) Works perfect, though
Offline
HP 1018
Rename old ghostscript-8.71-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz into ghostscript-9.00-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz and install it with "pacman -U". It is some kind of deceit but don't judge me) Works perfect, though
Russians are the best when it comes to improvise
I will give this a try, thank you!
Offline
Offline
HP 1018
Rename old ghostscript-8.71-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz into ghostscript-9.00-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz and install it with "pacman -U". It is some kind of deceit but don't judge me) Works perfect, though
And what is the purpose of this? Instead of just installing the ghostscript-8.71-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz package with pacman -U?
Offline