You are not logged in.

#1 2003-10-22 09:52:35

sud_crow
Member
From: Argentina
Registered: 2003-06-30
Posts: 545

lm_sensors maybe??

Can lm_sensors be updated so we can use it with kernel 2.4.22?
i think i already asked this, but they say that if someone insists, finally succeeds wink


Leonardo Andrés Gallego
www.archlinux-es.org || Comunidad Hispana de Arch Linux

Offline

#2 2003-10-22 10:27:58

Arielext
Member
From: Amersfoort, the Netherlands
Registered: 2002-08-12
Posts: 362
Website

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

Euhm ... I've built a package for it ages ago

Will upload it *again* to /incoming


apt-get install arch

Offline

#3 2003-10-22 11:15:08

Arielext
Member
From: Amersfoort, the Netherlands
Registered: 2002-08-12
Posts: 362
Website

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

i2c and lm_sensors are in ./ncoming

both compiled with and fior 2.4.22


apt-get install arch

Offline

#4 2003-10-22 13:39:03

sarah31
Member
From: Middle of Canada
Registered: 2002-08-20
Posts: 2,975
Website

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

As i have state MANY MANY times please do not upload upgrade versions of packages existing in the trees. If a package is out of date or has a bug please file a bug report or contact the maintainer of the package. if there is no maintainer stated then please just file a bug report.

there are already enough packages in incoming to deal with, packages in incoming that already exist in the repos only serves to slow the work of the people that work on the packages in incoming.


AKA uknowme

I am not your friend

Offline

#5 2003-10-22 14:45:49

Arielext
Member
From: Amersfoort, the Netherlands
Registered: 2002-08-12
Posts: 362
Website

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

Cool down!

Where on the frikkin internet is found that I should post a bug because I have a package somebody wants?


apt-get install arch

Offline

#6 2003-10-22 15:37:37

sarah31
Member
From: Middle of Canada
Registered: 2002-08-20
Posts: 2,975
Website

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

why do you assume that i am all upset? because i made the upteenth request of users not to do something?

why do bother coming here? people get all upset when i make a comment or suggestionn or request. it just isn't worth the agrivation any more.

if you want help from me email me or come on irc i've had it with this forum.


AKA uknowme

I am not your friend

Offline

#7 2003-10-22 15:40:53

Xentac
Forum Fellow
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2003-01-17
Posts: 1,797
Website

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

The bug tracker is on a link from the archlinux.org website.  Or you can just click here.


I have discovered that all of mans unhappiness derives from only one source, not being able to sit quietly in a room
- Blaise Pascal

Offline

#8 2003-10-23 05:04:06

sud_crow
Member
From: Argentina
Registered: 2003-06-30
Posts: 545

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

sarah31 wrote:

why do you assume that i am all upset? because i made the upteenth request of users not to do something?

why do bother coming here? people get all upset when i make a comment or suggestionn or request. it just isn't worth the agrivation any more.

if you want help from me email me or come on irc i've had it with this forum.


This is why ppl assume you are upset:

As i have state MANY MANY times...


There are ways and ways of saying something... I really didnt took your comment bad, but i must say it wasnt to kind either.
There are lots of ppl out there that will ask and do the same errors, you should take it a bit easier on them (me wink) or maybe express your self in some way it doesnt make ppl think you got upset.


About the package, i didnt contacted the manteiner because i thought this was the medium to do such requests... as you see in my original post, i asked if the package could be updated as it needs kernel 2.4.21 and Arch has 2.4.22 in repos. So, i cant use it anymore.... anyway, if thats the way to ask for updates, i will do it that way next time.

And Arielext thank you very much for the pkgs.


Leonardo Andrés Gallego
www.archlinux-es.org || Comunidad Hispana de Arch Linux

Offline

#9 2003-10-23 05:37:55

sud_crow
Member
From: Argentina
Registered: 2003-06-30
Posts: 545

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

Crap.
Im getting this error:

[root@archcrow crow]# pacman -U i2c.tar.bz2      
loading package data... load_pkg: missing package info file in i2c.tar.bz2

the same with lm_sensors:

[root@archcrow crow]#pacman -U lmsensors/lm_sensors.tar.bz2 
loading package data... load_pkg: missing package info file in lmsensors/lm_sensors.tar.bz2

Also tryed with -A instead, same error...


Leonardo Andrés Gallego
www.archlinux-es.org || Comunidad Hispana de Arch Linux

Offline

#10 2003-10-23 07:37:41

Arielext
Member
From: Amersfoort, the Netherlands
Registered: 2002-08-12
Posts: 362
Website

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

unpack them first, they contain the makepkg and the package itself


apt-get install arch

Offline

#11 2003-10-24 03:53:09

sud_crow
Member
From: Argentina
Registered: 2003-06-30
Posts: 545

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

OK,
had this issues:

[root@archcrow i2c]# pacman -U i2c-2.7.0-4.pkg.tar.gz 
loading package data... done.
checking for file conflicts... done.
installing i2c... done.
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/atm/he.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/i2c/scx200_i2c.o
[root@archcrow lm_sensors]# pacman -U lm_sensors-2.7.0-4.pkg.tar.gz 
loading package data... done.
checking for file conflicts... done.
installing lm_sensors... done.
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/atm/he.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/drivers/i2c/scx200_i2c.o

Is there any problem or they are just warnings?


Leonardo Andrés Gallego
www.archlinux-es.org || Comunidad Hispana de Arch Linux

Offline

#12 2003-10-24 07:17:13

Arielext
Member
From: Amersfoort, the Netherlands
Registered: 2002-08-12
Posts: 362
Website

Re: lm_sensors maybe??

If you don't use either one of them you can ignore the errors


apt-get install arch

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB