[CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

Gullible Jones · 2005-04-28 23:47:32

Ah. Then I'll stick with Vi...

miqorz · 2005-04-29 00:27:29

Uh, good for you?

droog · 2005-05-01 08:03:45

My latest, i made new scrollbars, menu borders, icons for rox's toolbar, buttons etc.
I had a few hours to mess around with gimp. i found that wallpaper in this thread somewhere and recolored it.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v613/ … titled.jpg

agm · 2005-05-01 11:00:18

agm wrote:

http://agm-homepage.de/images/screenshots/desktop.jpg
http://agm-homepage.de/images/screenshots/laptop.jpg

Changed mine, same link!

stonecrest · 2005-05-01 11:42:41

Well, I've been fooling around with fvwm since yesterday and I think I've fallen in love. I feel somewhat guilty since I've used xfce religiously since I started using linux but I just can't get over how much eye-candy there is for fvwm.. and how little resources it uses!

And yeah, this wallpaper is making like its third appearance in three pages. heh.

sn0n · 2005-05-01 16:48:49

My Latest

Edit: so much for html being on. :-p

droog · 2005-05-02 06:11:22

stonecrest wrote:

Well, I've been fooling around with fvwm since yesterday

Looks good for only 1 day of messing around with it, i think at that point i had just gotten my title bars a different color than that pink from the default config. I would say set up the focus, colormap, and window placement the same as xfce4, then you wont miss it as much.
thats what i had to do to make a permenant switch from fluxbox is make fvwm act just like a box, then go from there. anyways good luck.

murpheus40 · 2005-05-02 12:00:21

stonecrest wrote:

Well, I've been fooling around with fvwm since yesterday and I think I've fallen in love. I feel somewhat guilty since I've used xfce religiously since I started using linux but I just can't get over how much eye-candy there is for fvwm.. and how little resources it uses!
And yeah, this wallpaper is making like its third appearance in three pages. heh.

Hi,

Can you tell us where you get this wallpaper? Also, can you share your xfwm config file? Is it adesklets on your screenshot?

Thanks !

stonecrest · 2005-05-02 15:21:22

droog wrote:

Looks good for only 1 day of messing around with it, i think at that point i had just gotten my title bars a different color than that pink from the default config. I would say set up the focus, colormap, and window placement the same as xfce4, then you wont miss it as much.
thats what i had to do to make a permenant switch from fluxbox is make fvwm act just like a box, then go from there. anyways good luck.

Admittedly it was like 20 hours that I spent on it that day And there seem to be quite some good resources around for making a quick config file from other people's, so I certainly didn't create this from scratch - Tavis Ormandy's was especially helpful and the documentation on the website is great too. It still amazes me just how light and configurable fvwm is though. Thanks, I'm already feeling settled in..

murpheus40 wrote:

Can you tell us where you get this wallpaper? Also, can you share your xfwm config file? Is it adesklets on your screenshot?

The wallpaper can be found here. I'm not sure what a xfwm config file is but, as I said, this is fvwm. And that is the adesklets' Calendar desklet in the top right but the rest of it is fvwm stuff.

Cam · 2005-05-03 06:34:23

http://www.lynucs.org/index.php?screen_ … 9&m=screen

Vinny · 2005-05-04 08:51:57

I just started fooling around with Afterstep today.
Here's what it looks like now:Linkey

Gullible Jones · 2005-05-04 19:03:25

Whoah.

What happened to Afterstep, anyway? I thought it was dead... Looks a trillion times better than Windowmaker anyway.

miqorz · 2005-05-04 19:07:53

Meh, I think WindowMaker is much better looking. Then again, I though NeXTStep was amazingly sexy.

phrakture · 2005-05-04 19:22:38

this?
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=4042

I don't like it - no sexiness there

miqorz · 2005-05-04 19:47:28

What's not to love?

Gullible Jones · 2005-05-04 22:43:57

Now that is ugly. Afterstep looks good though, with transparency...

(IMO NeXTStep-type WMs look thoroughly hideous without transparency.)

shadowhand · 2005-05-05 00:14:39

*NeXT* Looks like something from the '70s.

Oh snap! It is!

sweiss · 2005-05-05 05:38:01

http://members.lycos.co.uk/sweiss3/extr … 052005.png

Simple KDE.

FUBAR · 2005-05-05 15:51:09

[URL=http://img164.echo.cx/my.php?image=root3vn.jpg] root3vn.th.jpg [/URL]

I just changed the style and background since my last post in this thread.

phrakture · 2005-05-05 15:58:44

very nice fubar! I wish I was able to use a WM where I had desktop space... but I can't lose the usability of tiling WMs... 8)

failure · 2005-05-05 20:58:02

http://screenshots.haque.net/screenshot … -27175.jpg

e17 cvs

miqorz · 2005-05-05 22:01:38

http://vortex.floppyhat.net/Images/2005-05-05.png

*shrug*

Nothing flashy. I'm sick of all these omgodwtflakes transparency bullshit people.

d3c3it · 2005-05-05 23:30:27

http://www.plasticmongoose.com/graphics … _taffy.png
The xfce desktop setup im using atm on my new T23 (new to me). No flashy shadows, runs too slow for me also i dont need it

Cam · 2005-05-06 00:20:29

http://www.myfilebin.com/userfiles/cam/ … ent005.jpg

another e17. it's actually starting to be slightly usable. got some decent config stuff now to edit their stupid eapp files and stupid menu/ibar layouts. entangle is my new bestest friend

Gullible Jones · 2005-05-06 00:37:02

Nice screen Miqorz... Ya gotta love Clearlooks.

(Hey, I didn't know that that Google bomb still existed! )

Oh, and I shall now take back everything I said about XFCE being ugly...

Anyway, here's my screenshot:

[URL=http://img126.echo.cx/my.php?image=screenshot5eo.jpg] screenshot5eo.th.jpg [/URL]

Clearlooks-Bright with Milk-Chrome borders and Edge icons (which, for some reason, are not all being used).

Arch Linux

#601 2005-04-28 23:47:32

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#602 2005-04-29 00:27:29

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#603 2005-05-01 08:03:45

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#604 2005-05-01 11:00:18

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#605 2005-05-01 11:42:41

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#606 2005-05-01 16:48:49

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#607 2005-05-02 06:11:22

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#608 2005-05-02 12:00:21

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#609 2005-05-02 15:21:22

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#610 2005-05-03 06:34:23

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#611 2005-05-04 08:51:57

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#612 2005-05-04 19:03:25

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#613 2005-05-04 19:07:53

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#614 2005-05-04 19:22:38

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#615 2005-05-04 19:47:28

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#616 2005-05-04 22:43:57

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#617 2005-05-05 00:14:39

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#618 2005-05-05 05:38:01

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#619 2005-05-05 15:51:09

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#620 2005-05-05 15:58:44

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#621 2005-05-05 20:58:02

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#622 2005-05-05 22:01:38

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#623 2005-05-05 23:30:27

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#624 2005-05-06 00:20:29

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

#625 2005-05-06 00:37:02

Re: [CLOSED - SEE MONTHLY STICKIES] Arch Desktop Screenshots

Board footer