You are not logged in.

#1 2010-12-15 18:03:37

whatshisname
Member
Registered: 2010-04-24
Posts: 163

Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

Another good review:

ITworld review: Arch Linux for Linux fundamentalists

http://www.itworld.com/operating-system … 2010-12-14

Offline

#2 2011-01-04 14:20:05

penguin
Member
From: Gotham City
Registered: 2010-12-31
Posts: 168

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

if you're the kind of person who likes a car with manual transmission and getting your hands dirty under the hood, then Arch Linux deserves your consideration.

haha, I think it depends on where you live. In America all cars are automatic, in Europe it's the opposite, at least where I live. Too bad both Europe and America use that "automatic" operating system, not counting Russia:
http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2010/ … linux.html

Offline

#3 2011-01-04 15:34:47

awfulrofl
Member
Registered: 2010-10-28
Posts: 23

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

In America all cars are automatic

wut

Offline

#4 2011-01-04 15:43:56

Inxsible
Forum Fellow
From: Chicago
Registered: 2008-06-09
Posts: 9,183

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

awfulrofl, please do not power post. Need I remind you rule # 14 from our forum rules?


Forum Rules

There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots !

Offline

#5 2011-01-04 15:46:31

awfulrofl
Member
Registered: 2010-10-28
Posts: 23

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

No need for reminder, sorry~

Offline

#6 2011-01-04 17:33:16

Misfit138
Misfit Emeritus
From: USA
Registered: 2006-11-27
Posts: 4,189

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

awfulrofl wrote:

In America all cars are automatic

wut

I must agree...Every vehicle I have ever owned (since 1988) with but one exception, has been a manual transmission.
No wonder I choose Arch(?) tongue
I think I get the point though; the overwhelming majority of cars here are automatic.

Offline

#7 2011-01-04 17:43:04

SS4
Member
From: !Rochford, Essex
Registered: 2010-12-05
Posts: 699

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

You can also download an even smaller image and rely on ftp to download the most recently available files for a fresh installation. I only recommend this course though if you have a very fast (10Mbps or faster) Internet connection.

I don't agree with that part of the article. The last core snapshot was May 2010 so you may as well download the net install since you'll have to redownload them anyway when you upgrade the system


Rauchen verboten

Offline

#8 2011-01-04 17:51:04

Ramses de Norre
Member
From: Leuven - Belgium
Registered: 2007-03-27
Posts: 1,289

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

SS4 wrote:

You can also download an even smaller image and rely on ftp to download the most recently available files for a fresh installation. I only recommend this course though if you have a very fast (10Mbps or faster) Internet connection.

I don't agree with that part of the article. The last core snapshot was May 2010 so you may as well download the net install since you'll have to redownload them anyway when you upgrade the system

I did a net install a few weeks on ago on a 4Mbps connection and it was a breeze. Download packages took no longer than an hour or so.
And indeed, you'll have to download it all anyway, so in fact the fastest way to install might be using the net install. And it will be surely the most download size effective way.

Offline

#9 2011-01-04 21:01:31

bunburya
Member
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: 2010-09-06
Posts: 64

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

Ramses de Norre wrote:
SS4 wrote:

You can also download an even smaller image and rely on ftp to download the most recently available files for a fresh installation. I only recommend this course though if you have a very fast (10Mbps or faster) Internet connection.

I don't agree with that part of the article. The last core snapshot was May 2010 so you may as well download the net install since you'll have to redownload them anyway when you upgrade the system

I did a net install a few weeks on ago on a 4Mbps connection and it was a breeze. Download packages took no longer than an hour or so.
And indeed, you'll have to download it all anyway, so in fact the fastest way to install might be using the net install. And it will be surely the most download size effective way.

I netinstalled over Christmas. My max download speed was 250kbps. Granted, I just left the laptop there for a while downloading while I went off and watched TV, but it didn't take a ridiculous amount of time.

Offline

#10 2011-01-04 21:17:54

SS4
Member
From: !Rochford, Essex
Registered: 2010-12-05
Posts: 699

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

bunburya wrote:
Ramses de Norre wrote:
SS4 wrote:

I don't agree with that part of the article. The last core snapshot was May 2010 so you may as well download the net install since you'll have to redownload them anyway when you upgrade the system

I did a net install a few weeks on ago on a 4Mbps connection and it was a breeze. Download packages took no longer than an hour or so.
And indeed, you'll have to download it all anyway, so in fact the fastest way to install might be using the net install. And it will be surely the most download size effective way.

I netinstalled over Christmas. My max download speed was 250kbps. Granted, I just left the laptop there for a while downloading while I went off and watched TV, but it didn't take a ridiculous amount of time.

I get much the same speed on my box, a bit less usually. It took me around an hour so, like you, I went to watch tv (and get a cup of tea).


Rauchen verboten

Offline

#11 2011-01-04 22:12:53

hurleyef
Member
Registered: 2010-06-22
Posts: 72

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

I prefer to install from the core image so that I can install piece by piece, configuring each little chunk while I wait for the next to download.  It feels to be more time efficient to me.

Offline

#12 2011-01-04 22:56:13

.:B:.
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2006-11-26
Posts: 5,819
Website

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

Misfit138 wrote:
awfulrofl wrote:

In America all cars are automatic

wut

I must agree...Every vehicle I have ever owned (since 1988) with but one exception, has been a manual transmission.
No wonder I choose Arch(?) tongue
I think I get the point though; the overwhelming majority of cars here are automatic.

Because you want torque tongue


Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy

Offline

#13 2011-01-05 00:46:24

Misfit138
Misfit Emeritus
From: USA
Registered: 2006-11-27
Posts: 4,189

Re: Arch Linux Review in ITWorld

.:B:. wrote:
Misfit138 wrote:
awfulrofl wrote:

wut

I must agree...Every vehicle I have ever owned (since 1988) with but one exception, has been a manual transmission.
No wonder I choose Arch(?) tongue
I think I get the point though; the overwhelming majority of cars here are automatic.

Because you want torque tongue

Heh, yeah. > 6.0Litres ftw. tongue

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB