You are not logged in.

#1 2011-04-15 19:36:45

amadar
Banned
Registered: 2011-04-15
Posts: 147

Package naming doesn't follow the Arch Way.

For example, instead of having packages named like "xfce4-whatever" why not just do "xfce-whatever" and let the version number of the package speak the rest?

It's not such a big deal, but it makes more sense. Doing "pacman -S xfce" should be a no brainer but that doesn't work. You have to install "xfce4".

It makes it seem like one can install "xfce3" or "xfce2" but that is against the Arch Way. The Arch philosophy includes "bleeding edge" in it somewhere, so installing "xfce" should automatically give you the latest, whether it be 4, 5, 6, 7, or 20.

Offline

#2 2011-04-15 19:44:55

wonder
Developer
From: Bucharest, Romania
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 5,941
Website

Re: Package naming doesn't follow the Arch Way.

heh, you really didn't look upstream...

http://archive.xfce.org/src/xfce/


Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.

Offline

#3 2011-04-15 20:35:49

amadar
Banned
Registered: 2011-04-15
Posts: 147

Re: Package naming doesn't follow the Arch Way.

Hmmm, good point. ^_^

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB