You are not logged in.

#26 2011-05-14 17:15:45

siriusb
Member
From: Hungary
Registered: 2010-01-01
Posts: 422

Re: Arch 64-bit today?

I like joking tongue

Offline

#27 2011-05-16 18:41:18

venky80
Member
Registered: 2007-05-13
Posts: 1,002

Re: Arch 64-bit today?

this has always been an issue Skype (I wonder when linux will have a good altenative) and wine , hope wine 64 becomes as good as wine 32 bit


Acer Aspire V5-573P Antergos KDE

Offline

#28 2011-05-17 01:58:20

ngoonee
Forum Fellow
From: Between Thailand and Singapore
Registered: 2009-03-17
Posts: 7,360

Re: Arch 64-bit today?

venky80 wrote:

this has always been an issue Skype (I wonder when linux will have a good altenative) and wine , hope wine 64 becomes as good as wine 32 bit

Wine 64-bit works just fine running 64-bit windows apps (which is what its MEANT to do). Most windows apps are 32-bit though...


Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.

Offline

#29 2011-05-17 20:37:42

rickeyski
Member
Registered: 2011-01-27
Posts: 25

Re: Arch 64-bit today?

And there begins the great catch-22 of the windows emulation layer and windows developers waiting to release 64 bit versions of programs until they can be sure people will pay for them.  Companies with an easy sell like matlab seem to be the first on board because there are obvious benefits, but microsoft can't even get around to 64 bit visual studio, etc yet, so why should anybody else.

Time to stop before the pro open source rant gets rolling

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB