You are not logged in.

#101 2011-06-01 12:59:52

mlq
Member
Registered: 2011-03-15
Posts: 171
Website

Re: jumanji - a web browser

Hello,

gorilla wrote:
nem wrote:

this project is awesome! just one little thing i'm missing is the 'gi'/'xgi'-command to jump to text-fields. i know it's possible with hints, but it's not as comfortable and also the 'follow hint' bar doesn't disappear after using it for a textfield thus still stuck in it. and auto-focussing text-fields would be something i would want to set off smile (on some pages it does autofocus like google, on some it does not, like aur for example). i didn't dig deep enough in the code yet, but maybe someone already has a clue how to do that?
keep up the great work!


I posted already a feature request for this, but no answer until now. It seem that the developers are very busy... This is one thing I really miss!

Do not take it amiss, because we won't forget about it. At the moment we are, like you mentioned, very busy and if we have time we concentrate more on zathura than jumanji, which we want to finish in the next weeks. Then we have more time for jumanji smile

Best regards

Offline

#102 2011-06-04 22:10:31

nXqd
Member
Registered: 2010-07-01
Posts: 173
Website

Re: jumanji - a web browser

Please don't let this thread down. This one is a great project, I use jumanji as my main browser in linux.

What is the hotkey for undo closed tab in jumanji  ?


When you live for a strong purpose, then hard work isn't an option. It's a necessity. - Steve Pavlina
dotFiles

Offline

#103 2011-06-04 23:37:54

burn
Member
Registered: 2010-04-13
Posts: 21

Re: jumanji - a web browser

its 'u'

Offline

#104 2011-06-05 00:54:22

bangkok_manouel
Member
From: indicates a starting point
Registered: 2005-02-07
Posts: 1,554

Re: jumanji - a web browser

forum fellows, does the right click 'Copy Link Location' work for you? i'd like to debug this to help getting a longer life by avoiding frustration. my kids will thank you.


All design goals must be phrased in such a way that it is hard to use them as slogans to justify stupidity.

Online

#105 2011-06-05 16:44:54

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,931

Re: jumanji - a web browser

bangkok_manouel wrote:

forum fellows, does the right click 'Copy Link Location' work for you? i'd like to debug this to help getting a longer life by avoiding frustration. my kids will thank you.

Yes. This was copied from your link above:

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 71#p943571

Offline

#106 2011-06-05 19:17:04

bangkok_manouel
Member
From: indicates a starting point
Registered: 2005-02-07
Posts: 1,554

Re: jumanji - a web browser

Thanks skottish. I knew I had to start my post with "forum fellows"...


All design goals must be phrased in such a way that it is hard to use them as slogans to justify stupidity.

Online

#107 2011-06-05 19:53:16

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,931

Re: jumanji - a web browser

bangkok_manouel wrote:

Thanks skottish. I knew I had to start my post with "forum fellows"...

What's happening when you try?

Offline

#108 2011-06-05 19:59:32

bangkok_manouel
Member
From: indicates a starting point
Registered: 2005-02-07
Posts: 1,554

Re: jumanji - a web browser

skottish wrote:
bangkok_manouel wrote:

Thanks skottish. I knew I had to start my post with "forum fellows"...

What's happening when you try?

nuthin', that's my problem :-P

/edit: most likely a webkit issue. it works fine with 1.2.7

Last edited by bangkok_manouel (2011-06-05 20:26:39)


All design goals must be phrased in such a way that it is hard to use them as slogans to justify stupidity.

Online

#109 2011-06-05 20:38:09

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,931

Re: jumanji - a web browser

When is the last time that you rebuilt jumanji? Changes in the underlining packages can introduce strange bugs without causing outright breaking.

Offline

#110 2011-06-05 20:49:59

bangkok_manouel
Member
From: indicates a starting point
Registered: 2005-02-07
Posts: 1,554

Re: jumanji - a web browser

I just rebuilt it today against 1.2.7 and then again against 1.4.1
git bisecting webkit will be a lot of fun :\


All design goals must be phrased in such a way that it is hard to use them as slogans to justify stupidity.

Online

#111 2011-06-05 20:59:07

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,931

Re: jumanji - a web browser

Before you go absolutely nuts, which you're on the edge of right now, it would be worth it to see if you have any errors in your jumanjirc file. The only time that I've seen jumanji misbehave when there wasn't a simple rebuild involved is when I've had syntax errors in my jumanjirc file.

Offline

#112 2011-06-05 21:06:17

bangkok_manouel
Member
From: indicates a starting point
Registered: 2005-02-07
Posts: 1,554

Re: jumanji - a web browser

good idea, thanks, but no luck... I started jumanji without any jumanjirc and the issue is still there...


All design goals must be phrased in such a way that it is hard to use them as slogans to justify stupidity.

Online

#113 2011-06-05 21:10:39

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,931

Re: jumanji - a web browser

bangkok_manouel wrote:

good idea, thanks, but no luck... I started jumanji without any jumanjirc and the issue is still there...

Good look with that. webkit is, for lack of better words, large.

Offline

#114 2011-06-07 10:56:56

akira86
Member
Registered: 2009-01-16
Posts: 118

Re: jumanji - a web browser

I just pushed some modification in the jumanji repository in the branch 'new_webgtk'

This modified version use the new gtk+3 and libwebkitgtk-3

* The hitting process have been merged in the C code so there is no need for the .js script
(you can remove the "script ..." command from you jumanjirc)

* scrollbar are now mandatory (due to the new libwebkit and gtk+3 behaviour)

* the flash plugin doesn't work anymore (same as epiphany) due to is use of gtk2 (it seams). But html5 video works :-) .

If you want to try it :

git clone git://pwmt.org/jumanji.git -b new_webgtk

Offline

#115 2011-06-09 12:22:41

tips
Member
From: USA
Registered: 2011-04-20
Posts: 10
Website

Re: jumanji - a web browser

Hey guys, This problem is ridiculous, all jumanji does is segfaults, I can't even get to my home page, it barely opens (%10) then it crashes with segfault. I want to use this freakin browser but its frustrating. The problem is libwebkit. I have the latest 1.4.1, the only version that works correctly is 1.2.7, which was fine. but then libwebkit3 was upgraded and libwebkit has to match it or sth, do now I cant downgrade libwebkit 3 back and im stuck in this hole. I want to fix this retarded issue, that only I seem to have. Everyone else seems to work fine on libwebkit 1.4.1, mine doesn't even get to a home page, just crashes with no messages other than segfault.
Just to know, I have a fully updated system, with testing enabled and fully updated. I also rebuilt jumanji numerous times from AUR and from pwmt.org and no luck. I tried eveerything I can think of, pleasssssssssse someone help. Thanks. I'll try anything.

Offline

#116 2011-06-09 12:37:21

akira86
Member
Registered: 2009-01-16
Posts: 118

Re: jumanji - a web browser

did you try the "new_webgtk" branch ?

Offline

#117 2011-06-10 12:39:25

inkling
Member
Registered: 2011-04-27
Posts: 4

Re: jumanji - a web browser

differnt user same problem with seg fault. got new_webgtk branch and compiled. The extra repositories had libwekit3 and libunique3 which i installed and allowed me to compile new_webgtk branch. However when I start it from the command line it gives this:

** (jumanji:4243): WARNING **: Error loading plugin: libhspell.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

No bp log location saved, using default.
[000:010] Browser XEmbed support present: 1
[000:010] Browser toolkit is Gtk2.
[000:010] Using Gtk2 toolkit
[000:011] Warning(optionsfile.cc:22): Load: Could not open file
[000:011] No bp log location saved, using default.
[000:011] Browser XEmbed support present: 1
[000:011] Browser toolkit is Gtk2.
[000:011] Using Gtk2 toolkit
Segmentation fault

which seems to indicate it is using gtk2 still.

Offline

#118 2011-06-10 13:42:44

inkling
Member
Registered: 2011-04-27
Posts: 4

Re: jumanji - a web browser

mucked about. ran make debug and ran gdb against resulting jumanji-debug got resulting stack trace:
#0  0x00007ffff6b90fde in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#1  0x00007ffff65bfc55 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#2  0x00007ffff6c9b9f7 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#3  0x00007ffff6c9ca19 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#4  0x00007ffff6c65717 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#5  0x00007ffff6ac3639 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#6  0x00007ffff6ac3ad4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#7  0x00007ffff699efb1 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#8  0x00007ffff6b0987f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#9  0x00007ffff6b0b7ea in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#10 0x00007ffff6b0b959 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#11 0x00007ffff6b0c288 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#12 0x00007ffff6832d7a in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#13 0x00007ffff699bdcd in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#14 0x00007ffff69a3475 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#15 0x00007ffff673cb26 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#16 0x00007ffff673cd23 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#17 0x00007ffff673d064 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#18 0x00007ffff6fd41f9 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#19 0x00007ffff72a63e5 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#20 0x00007ffff729afc9 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0
#21 0x00007fffa4253558 in ?? ()
#22 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

this is meaningless to me, of course. is there a better make option to get more meaningfull info, is there a good way to interpret this. I realize google is my freind, but if someone could short circuit such a search by showing me somewhere to shoot my ignorance/stupid would be much obliged. will muck later should really be working ...

**edit some bad spelling i'm sure you'll find more:)

Last edited by inkling (2011-06-10 13:44:24)

Offline

#119 2011-06-10 14:23:13

akira86
Member
Registered: 2009-01-16
Posts: 118

Re: jumanji - a web browser

inkling wrote:

differnt user same problem with seg fault. got new_webgtk branch and compiled. The extra repositories had libwekit3 and libunique3 which i installed and allowed me to compile new_webgtk branch. However when I start it from the command line it gives this:

** (jumanji:4243): WARNING **: Error loading plugin: libhspell.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

for the libhspell.so problem :

yaourt -S extra/hspell

and recompile.

inkling wrote:

No bp log location saved, using default.
[000:010] Browser XEmbed support present: 1
[000:010] Browser toolkit is Gtk2.
[000:010] Using Gtk2 toolkit
...
which seems to indicate it is using gtk2 still.

Did you install "extra/gtk3" ??
And try this.

Offline

#120 2011-06-10 19:02:20

inkling
Member
Registered: 2011-04-27
Posts: 4

Re: jumanji - a web browser

hspell installed and recompiled (although i'm fairly sure thats a holdover that never bothered me). did not explicitly install extra/gtk3, but was installed and now reinstalled. nspluginwrapper and flashplugin removed flashplugin-prerelease installed, recompile again for good measure. Same output minus hspell warning.

Offline

#121 2011-06-10 20:06:15

mlq
Member
Registered: 2011-03-15
Posts: 171
Website

Re: jumanji - a web browser

Hello,

inkling wrote:

is there a good way to interpret this. I realize google is my freind, but if someone could short circuit such a search by showing me somewhere to shoot my ignorance/stupid would be much obliged. will muck later should really be working ...

Try to build a build with debug information of webkit (If I remember correctly you just need to pass --enable-debug to the configure call). Then we can exactly see where it fails.

I can't reproduce it.

Best regards

Offline

#122 2011-06-10 21:02:47

jwbirdsong
Member
From: Western KS USA
Registered: 2006-11-25
Posts: 173

Re: jumanji - a web browser

Bug re: hspell error filed
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24671


PLEASE read and try to FIX/FILE BUGS instead of assuming other have/will.

Offline

#123 2011-06-10 23:33:15

altercation
Member
From: Seattle
Registered: 2011-05-15
Posts: 135
Website

Re: jumanji - a web browser

akira86 wrote:

I just pushed some modification in the jumanji repository in the branch 'new_webgtk'

This modified version use the new gtk+3 and libwebkitgtk-3

<snip>

If you want to try it :

git clone git://pwmt.org/jumanji.git -b new_webgtk

This worked pretty well for me. I tossed together an AUR for this. If there is a better way to do this or a full AUR package isn't appropriate here, let me know.

AUR Package:  jumanji-new_webgtk-git

EDIT: nope. Forget it... I'll leave the AUR package there for now but I'm suddenly getting segfaults again.

Last edited by altercation (2011-06-10 23:36:12)


Ethan Schoonover
Precision Colors - http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized

Offline

#124 2011-06-11 06:23:07

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,931

Re: jumanji - a web browser

mlq wrote:

Hello,

inkling wrote:

is there a good way to interpret this. I realize google is my freind, but if someone could short circuit such a search by showing me somewhere to shoot my ignorance/stupid would be much obliged. will muck later should really be working ...

Try to build a build with debug information of webkit (If I remember correctly you just need to pass --enable-debug to the configure call). Then we can exactly see where it fails.

I can't reproduce it.

Best regards

inkling, are you behind a proxy of some kind? I've been seeing segfaults in jumanji that seem to be related to my usage of privoxy. I have not been able to reproduce this with midori at all. I don't usually use midori so it may be chance, but disabling privoxy keeps jumanji alive.

mlq, it is likely that proxy handling in jumanji is broken. When jumanji crashes, it stops the privoxy daemon. There is nothing in the privoxy logs to indicate why. What can I do to help?

Last edited by skottish (2011-06-11 06:30:46)

Offline

#125 2011-06-11 18:28:00

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,931

Re: jumanji - a web browser

skottish wrote:
mlq wrote:

Hello,

inkling wrote:

is there a good way to interpret this. I realize google is my freind, but if someone could short circuit such a search by showing me somewhere to shoot my ignorance/stupid would be much obliged. will muck later should really be working ...

Try to build a build with debug information of webkit (If I remember correctly you just need to pass --enable-debug to the configure call). Then we can exactly see where it fails.

I can't reproduce it.

Best regards

inkling, are you behind a proxy of some kind? I've been seeing segfaults in jumanji that seem to be related to my usage of privoxy. I have not been able to reproduce this with midori at all. I don't usually use midori so it may be chance, but disabling privoxy keeps jumanji alive.

mlq, it is likely that proxy handling in jumanji is broken. When jumanji crashes, it stops the privoxy daemon. There is nothing in the privoxy logs to indicate why. What can I do to help?

I'm wrong on the above. jumanji still segfaults, but seemingly less without privoxy. I saw the info on glibc on the dev mailing list and I'm wondering if that's related. I just did a rebuild of privoxy and jumanji. I'll report back my findings.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB