You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hello everyone
I've recently come across an article on Linux Magazine about, 'the sense -- or nonsense -- of journaling and delayed allocation before a commit in the ext3 and ext4 filesystems.'
Also, in this article, Linus Torvalds, raised some issues about ext3 and ext4. I give heed to what he says, as he is the creator of the GNU/Linux kernel.
This made me become a bit more concerned about the reliability of my system in the long-run, as I have no problems as of yet. (apart from one irremovable, 0byte file)
Here is the url: http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Ne … 3-and-Ext4
I'd like to gather more data from the forums, so I am able to justify whether or not I should change file-systems, to, for example, JFS(I have read the documentation from Archwiki, about tweaking JFS to it's maximum performance and stability.) As it stands, I am very much inclined in formatting /root and /home as JFS files-systems.
Any input is welcome
Offline
I like to live dangerously - even when sitting comfortably at home - that's why I'll stick to ext three quarters.
Offline
Doing what Linus says is all fine and good. But you also have to keep in mind the limitations of JFS or XFS. A couple of things come to mind, although I am not sure if they are still applicable.
1) XFS and JFS cannot be shrunk after the partition is made, which means that you have to re-create them if you need to change partition sizes.
2) XFS is more suited to larger files and so partitions like /var in Arch would cause performance issues as compared to reiserfs
Ext3/Ext4 also have their own limitations, so it all boils down to what you want to use something for.
Last edited by Inxsible (2010-07-20 23:38:03)
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots !
Offline
Pages: 1