You are not logged in.

#1 2014-08-21 08:05:15

lord.garbage
Member
Registered: 2014-04-28
Posts: 13

[SOLVED] Has Archlinux indeed moved binaries to /usr?

I saw the new Archlinux arch-announce Digest, Vol 32, Issue 1 today and read through some older topics. There was an announcement on 2013-06-03 by Allan McRae stating that binaries move to /usr/bin. Has this really happened? Or is this done gradually and that is why /bin, /sbin and /lib are still there?

Last edited by lord.garbage (2014-08-21 12:33:46)

Offline

#2 2014-08-21 08:13:53

dice
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2014-02-10
Posts: 413

Re: [SOLVED] Has Archlinux indeed moved binaries to /usr?

At least at my system this is true so I guess it has happened.
/bin, /sbin and /lib are symlinks to the coresponding folders under /usr


I put at button on it. Yes. I wish to press it, but I'm not sure what will happen if I do.  (Gune | Titan A.E.)

Offline

#3 2014-08-21 08:15:42

lord.garbage
Member
Registered: 2014-04-28
Posts: 13

Re: [SOLVED] Has Archlinux indeed moved binaries to /usr?

Ah, now I understand. The folders are symlinked... Cheers dice!

Offline

#4 2014-08-21 11:50:32

karol
Archivist
Registered: 2009-05-06
Posts: 25,440

Re: [SOLVED] Has Archlinux indeed moved binaries to /usr?

https://www.archlinux.org/news/binaries … ervention/ has a link to https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail … 22625.html which says

* By symlinking the old directories to /usr/{bin,lib} we keep
backwards compatibility, and also improve our compatibility with
distros that chose to put their binaries in different locations.


Please remember to mark the thread as solved https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=130309

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB