You are not logged in.

#1 2009-04-16 23:54:51

Nalroff
Member
Registered: 2009-04-16
Posts: 6

Pacman FAIL

I'm a complete NUB so bear w/ me. I just did a pacman -Syu on an older machine that I've been playing with, and after the upgrade completed, pacman was broken. Every time I try to do anything now it says this:

:: Synchronizing package databases...
error: failed to update core (unexpected error)
error: failed to update extra (unexpected error)
error: failed to update community (unexpected error)
error: failed to synchronize any databases

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Nalroff

Offline

#2 2009-04-16 23:58:44

keenerd
Package Maintainer (PM)
Registered: 2007-02-22
Posts: 647
Website

Re: Pacman FAIL

What does

pacman -Qs pacman

report?

Offline

#3 2009-04-17 00:03:20

Maxa
Member
Registered: 2008-11-30
Posts: 31

Re: Pacman FAIL

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70152

After the upgrade, mirrorlist doesn't probably have any mirrors uncommented. Happens if pacman hasn't been updated since, what, December? http://www.archlinux.org/news/427/

Offline

#4 2009-04-17 01:06:10

Nalroff
Member
Registered: 2009-04-16
Posts: 6

Re: Pacman FAIL

Thanks, Maxa, that thread helped tremendously. I wonder why they did that though? To me, it makes no sense. If someone has a better understanding on the subject, please elaborate.

Offline

#5 2009-04-17 03:56:44

fukawi2
Ex-Administratorino
From: .vic.au
Registered: 2007-09-28
Posts: 6,224
Website

Re: Pacman FAIL

Nalroff wrote:

Thanks, Maxa, that thread helped tremendously. I wonder why they did that though? To me, it makes no sense. If someone has a better understanding on the subject, please elaborate.

Snowman in "that thread" wrote:

We want to force users to uncomment the appropriate mirrors for their location instead of just using  the first one on the list by default.

Offline

#6 2009-04-17 12:05:15

.:B:.
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2006-11-26
Posts: 5,819
Website

Re: Pacman FAIL

Please refrain from using 'FAIL' in your titles.... 99% it's the user that's at fault, not the system. No matter how stupid (or smart) your question is, such titles only make you look stupid.


Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB