unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2014-11-19 21:56:06

graysky wrote:

Please keep this thread on topic! Report only repo/packaging related problems here; open a new thread for non-repo related problems.

Please open a thread relating to your issue if not repo related.

dom0 · 2014-11-22 18:49:47

Since I often have issues downloading the packages (aborted connections with the usual workaround, low speed etc.) I set up an (automated) mirror of this repository. Details at https://github.com/enkore/mirror-repo-ck

The mirror is located in Germany and has some hundred mbit/s bandwidth available ; interestingly that server has much less trouble accessing repo-ck.com. Might be the bad peering provided by german Telekom to blame here for low download speeds at my home.

~~@graysky: If you do not wish that I mirror your repository, let me know ; I'll take it down immediately.~~

Last edited by dom0 (2014-11-22 21:20:41)

graysky · 2014-11-22 19:12:51

I would appreciate it if you would take it down. Why? With mirrors, I can't parse the server logs to figure out package popularity and understand if certain arch/cpus are simply unused. Since I build all 19 package sets on my workstation, it is quite time consuming. I only want to provide packages if people are using them. This is why I never liked the idea of mirroring repo-ck.

Link: http://repo-ck.com/stats.pdf

Last edited by graysky (2014-11-22 20:06:49)

pho · 2014-11-22 20:14:25

Today on my update I got this:
error: failed retrieving file 'nvidia-340xx-ck-atom-340.58-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz' from repo-ck.com : The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found

So I'm very very happy with the mirror

cju · 2014-11-23 19:00:27

Sometimes – i'm not able to figure out if it happens reguarly – the repo limits the download speed to roundabout 50 KB/s. All other Downloadspeeds are fine at the same time, so I guess it's the ck-repo that throttles. But why and why just sometimes (~ once a week)?

cju · 2014-11-23 22:19:47

'Nother thing :

I don't want to be grumpy or impolite, but the nvidia packages for bulldozer and piledriver didn't seem to get an update like the rest, and so, my X dies: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=190249

graysky · 2014-11-23 22:45:35

cju wrote:

'Nother thing :
I don't want to be grumpy or impolite, but the nvidia packages for bulldozer and piledriver didn't seem to get an update like the rest, and so, my X dies: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=190249

This is entirely my fault. i made a change to my build script which excluded certain arches from the update. I believe it's fixed now. Rebuilding and will populate repo-ck shortly. Sorry for the inconvenience.

graysky · 2014-11-24 00:05:18

Fixed!

cju · 2014-11-24 07:41:50

Thanks, works like a charm again.

graysky · 2014-11-24 12:34:05

That should not be a normal occurrence. I cleaned-up my build script and just made a simple mistake in the process. Thanks for reporting.

Sacro · 2014-11-24 14:07:01

Actually it's not working -

error: nvidia-ck: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is invalid
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/nvidia-ck-343.22-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).

karol · 2014-11-24 14:10:57

Sacro wrote:

Actually it's not working -
error: nvidia-ck: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is invalid
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/nvidia-ck-343.22-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).

Did it use to work for you? Did you set it up correctly?

Sacro · 2014-11-24 14:25:25

karol wrote:

Sacro wrote:
Actually it's not working -
error: nvidia-ck: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is invalid
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/nvidia-ck-343.22-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Did it use to work for you? Did you set it up correctly?

Yes and yes, the linux-ck-ivybridge package upgraded just fine.

graysky · 2014-11-24 15:17:23

Sacro wrote:

error: nvidia-ck: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is invalid
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/nvidia-ck-343.22-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).

Worked for me... could be a bad download. Please clear that package from your cache and try again:

% sudo pacman -S ck-generic
:: There are 8 members in group ck-generic:
:: Repository repo-ck
   1) broadcom-wl-ck  2) linux-ck  3) linux-ck-headers  4) nvidia-304xx-ck  5) nvidia-340xx-ck  6) nvidia-ck
   7) virtualbox-ck-guest-modules  8) virtualbox-ck-host-modules

Enter a selection (default=all): 1 2 6 8
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...

Packages (4): broadcom-wl-ck-6.30.223.248-9  linux-ck-3.17.4-1  nvidia-ck-343.22-6  virtualbox-ck-host-modules-4.3.20-1

Total Download Size:    7.65 MiB
Total Installed Size:   72.21 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] 
:: Retrieving packages ...
 broadcom-wl-ck-6.30.223.248-9-i686                   2.6 MiB  1325K/s 00:02 [############################################] 100%
 nvidia-ck-343.22-6-i686                              4.9 MiB  2.88M/s 00:02 [############################################] 100%
 virtualbox-ck-host-modules-4.3.20-1-i686           160.5 KiB  11.2M/s 00:00 [############################################] 100%
(4/4) checking keys in keyring                                               [############################################] 100%
(4/4) checking package integrity                                             [############################################] 100%
(4/4) loading package files                                                  [############################################] 100%
(4/4) checking for file conflicts                                            [############################################] 100%
(4/4) checking available disk space                                          [############################################] 100%
(1/4) installing linux-ck                                                    [############################################] 100%
>>> Updating module dependencies. Please wait ...
>>> Generating initial ramdisk, using mkinitcpio.  Please wait...
==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-ck.preset: 'default'
  -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux-ck -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-ck.img
==> Starting build: 3.17.4-1-ck
  -> Running build hook: [base]
  -> Running build hook: [udev]
  -> Running build hook: [autodetect]
  -> Running build hook: [modconf]
  -> Running build hook: [block]
  -> Running build hook: [filesystems]
  -> Running build hook: [keyboard]
  -> Running build hook: [fsck]
==> Generating module dependencies
==> Creating uncompressed initcpio image: /boot/initramfs-linux-ck.img
==> Image generation successful
==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-ck.preset: 'fallback'
  -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux-ck -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-ck-fallback.img -S autodetect
==> Starting build: 3.17.4-1-ck
  -> Running build hook: [base]
  -> Running build hook: [udev]
  -> Running build hook: [modconf]
  -> Running build hook: [block]
==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: aic94xx
==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: smsmdtv
  -> Running build hook: [filesystems]
  -> Running build hook: [keyboard]
  -> Running build hook: [fsck]
==> Generating module dependencies
==> Creating uncompressed initcpio image: /boot/initramfs-linux-ck-fallback.img
==> Image generation successful
Optional dependencies for linux-ck
    crda: to set the correct wireless channels of your country
    nvidia-ck: nVidia drivers for linux-ck [pending]
    modprobed_db: Keeps track of EVERY kernel module that has ever been probed - useful for those of us who make localmodconfig
(2/4) installing broadcom-wl-ck                                              [############################################] 100%
(3/4) installing nvidia-ck                                                   [############################################] 100%
In order to use nvidia module, reboot the system.
(4/4) installing virtualbox-ck-host-modules                                  [############################################] 100%
===> You must load vboxdrv module before starting VirtualBox:
===> # modprobe vboxdrv

Sacro · 2014-11-25 16:45:28

graysky wrote:

Sacro wrote:
error: nvidia-ck: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is invalid
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/nvidia-ck-343.22-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Worked for me... could be a bad download. Please clear that package from your cache and try again:

Have done a few times, still fails.

graysky · 2014-11-25 18:07:46

Not sure what's wrong since it worked on my ws. Probably the easiest thing I can do is simply to rebuild bumping the pkgver and see if that helps. I need a few hours and will post when done,

keepitsimpleengineer · 2014-11-25 19:34:35

Is there any reason the atom-ck would fail to revive from suspend lately?

I have seen this behavior recently on my infrequently used Lenovo S12 laptop?
It successfully revives when a non-ck kernel is used... .. .

Thanx

Linux KISE-007 3.17.4-1-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Nov 21 17:26:46 EST 2014 i686 GNU/Linux

vendor_id: GenuineIntel ~ cpu family: 6 ~ model: 28 ~ model name Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz
stepping: 2 ~ microcode: 0x212 ~ cpu MHz: 800.000 ~ cache size: 512 KB
250GB SSD

Last edited by keepitsimpleengineer (2014-11-25 19:38:36)

graysky · 2014-11-25 19:50:39

@keepitsim- Sorry, I have no idea. My standard question is do you see this behavior with the ARCH kernel? If it is related to ck's patchset, best to email him directly or post to his blog.

graysky · 2014-11-25 19:53:31

OK... nvidia-ck has been bumped to 343.22-7 with new sigs. Please update and see if this solves the issues.

keepitsimpleengineer · 2014-11-25 20:26:59

graysky wrote:

My standard question is do you see this behavior with the ARCH kernel?

Cannot say WRT arch kernel, was not installed on the laptop.

Suspend does work when using Manjaro Linux 3.17.0-1 kernel.

More boring details: I bricked the laptop archlinux system when trying to install uswsusp (initramfs fail) to use as a workaround.
I then installed Manjaro 32bit where suspend worked. After installing repo-ck's atom-ck and the broadcom-wl-ck-atom, suspend failed.

clfarron4 · 2014-11-25 20:40:35

keepitsimpleengineer wrote:

graysky wrote:
My standard question is do you see this behavior with the ARCH kernel?
Cannot say WRT arch kernel, was not installed on the laptop.
Suspend does work when using Manjaro Linux 3.17.0-1 kernel.
More boring details: I bricked the laptop archlinux system when trying to install uswsusp (initramfs fail) to use as a workaround.
I then installed Manjaro 32bit where suspend worked. After installing repo-ck's atom-ck and the broadcom-wl-ck-atom, suspend failed.

Hmm... Manjaro do include BFS in their kernel (I don't think they include BFQ though)...

Sacro · 2014-11-26 10:12:45

graysky wrote:

OK... nvidia-ck has been bumped to 343.22-7 with new sigs. Please update and see if this solves the issues.

Thanks graysky, all is well now!

keepitsimpleengineer · 2014-11-26 22:33:55

keepitsimpleengineer wrote:

Is there any reason the atom-ck would fail to revive from suspend lately?
I have seen this behavior recently on my infrequently used Lenovo S12 laptop?
It successfully revives when a non-ck kernel is used... .. .
Thanx
Linux KISE-007 3.17.4-1-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Nov 21 17:26:46 EST 2014 i686 GNU/Linux
vendor_id: GenuineIntel ~ cpu family: 6 ~ model: 28 ~ model name Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz
stepping: 2 ~ microcode: 0x212 ~ cpu MHz: 800.000 ~ cache size: 512 KB
250GB SSD
graysky wrote:
My standard question is do you see this behavior with the ARCH kernel?
Cannot say WRT arch kernel, was not installed on the laptop.
Suspend does work when using Manjaro Linux 3.17.0-1 kernel.

Archlinux system resurrected, and fails to recover from suspend with linux kernel as does the linux-ck kernel.

Linux KISE-007 3.17.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Nov 21 21:16:21 CET 2014 i686 GNU/Linux

Thanx

Note: FS#42820 - [linux] 3.17.3 not waking up after suspend-to-RAM

Update: Fixed in kernel linux-ck 3.17.5-1 (2014-12-07)

Last edited by keepitsimpleengineer (2014-12-07 21:59:10)

armandrix · 2014-11-27 00:33:00

Hi there,
First I would like to tank you for this repo and it's great service for us all..
I'm using it for a while but without sign check (pacman.conf option commented: "#SigLevel = Required").
I would like to activate the signature check, but doing so, I get an fatal error:

"erro: falha ao obter o arquivo "repo-ck.db.sig" de repo-ck.com : The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found
erro: repo-ck: missing required signature"

It's something like: retrieving file "repo-ck.db.sig" from repo-ck.com failed. There is also an 404 code.

I've tried:

graysky wrote:

You likely just need to sign my key:
# pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C && pacman-key --lsign-key 5EE46C4C

I had followed directions from wiki to add unofficial repos and keys at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/un … positories.

I tried to manually download the complainned file "repo-ck.db.sig", but couldn't find it.

Could anybody tells me what can I do to check it??

Thanks

Korrode · 2014-11-27 00:41:24

clfarron4 wrote:

Hmm... Manjaro do include BFS in their kernel (I don't think they include BFQ though)...

Other way round. Manjaro kernel does include BFQ, it does not include BFS.

Arch Linux

#2051 2014-11-19 21:56:06

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2052 2014-11-22 18:49:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2053 2014-11-22 19:12:51

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2054 2014-11-22 20:14:25

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2055 2014-11-23 19:00:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2056 2014-11-23 22:19:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2057 2014-11-23 22:45:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2058 2014-11-24 00:05:18

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2059 2014-11-24 07:41:50

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2060 2014-11-24 12:34:05

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2061 2014-11-24 14:07:01

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2062 2014-11-24 14:10:57

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2063 2014-11-24 14:25:25

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2064 2014-11-24 15:17:23

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2065 2014-11-25 16:45:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2066 2014-11-25 18:07:46

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2067 2014-11-25 19:34:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2068 2014-11-25 19:50:39

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2069 2014-11-25 19:53:31

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2070 2014-11-25 20:26:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2071 2014-11-25 20:40:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2072 2014-11-26 10:12:45

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2073 2014-11-26 22:33:55

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2074 2014-11-27 00:33:00

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2075 2014-11-27 00:41:24

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer