Arch Linux

halocaridina

Member

From: US

Registered: 2014-07-21

Posts: 77

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Could the AUR inox-bin package be rebuilt? A rebuild is needed since the libvpx 1.6.0-2 update ~ 08/05/16 causes inox-bin to fail with:

/usr/lib/inox/inox: error while loading shared libraries: libvpx.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Thank you!!

---

4X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 @ 2.40GHz; 256GiB; 11TB EXT4; SL6.8
2X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz; 256GiB; 3.4TB EXT4; SL6.8
Thinkpad X250; Broadwell-ULT Core i5; 8GiB, 525GB Crucial_CT525MX3; Arch
Thinkpad T440S; Haswell-ULT Core i7; 12GiB, 512GB SanDisk X210; Arch

gcarq

Member

From: Austria

Registered: 2013-10-07

Posts: 40

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Released version 53.0.2785.89 with a new icon set

halocaridina

Member

From: US

Registered: 2014-07-21

Posts: 77

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Update much appreciated, thank you!

---

4X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 @ 2.40GHz; 256GiB; 11TB EXT4; SL6.8
2X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz; 256GiB; 3.4TB EXT4; SL6.8
Thinkpad X250; Broadwell-ULT Core i5; 8GiB, 525GB Crucial_CT525MX3; Arch
Thinkpad T440S; Haswell-ULT Core i7; 12GiB, 512GB SanDisk X210; Arch

halocaridina

Member

From: US

Registered: 2014-07-21

Posts: 77

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

@gcarq

Hope this finds you well. Is there an ETA for the next release of inox/inox-bin?

Thanks again for maintaining this great browser,

Halocaridina

---

4X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 @ 2.40GHz; 256GiB; 11TB EXT4; SL6.8
2X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz; 256GiB; 3.4TB EXT4; SL6.8
Thinkpad X250; Broadwell-ULT Core i5; 8GiB, 525GB Crucial_CT525MX3; Arch
Thinkpad T440S; Haswell-ULT Core i7; 12GiB, 512GB SanDisk X210; Arch

patlux

Member

Registered: 2015-03-19

Posts: 5

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

https://sslmate.com/blog/post/ct_redaction_in_chrome_53

Due to a bug in Chrome, versions of Chrome 53 that are more than 10 weeks old now display this error message for all websites using Symantec certificates that were issued on or after June 1, 2016

Thank you for this great browser!

Patrick

/ Edit:

website visitors can simply restart Chrome to avoid the bug

Last edited by patlux (2016-11-13 19:40:46)

---

const { aur,  github,  dotfiles } = patrick;

cryzed

Member

Registered: 2010-05-11

Posts: 14

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

I'm trying to use inox with Selenium, by adjusting the executable path and options accordingly when starting the webdriver. When using Selenium with Chromium the browser starts, an extension called "Chrome Automation Extension" automatically appears in the list and the instance is automatable with Selenium, however when done so with inox the browser starts and the extension appears, however a timeout error in Selenium occurs while waiting for the service to respond. (Manually installing chromedriver is required for inox, since it doesn't ship with it as it does with Chromium).

I checked the various patches, but couldn't find anything obvious in them that might explain the timeout, i.e. you specifically disabling the features that would allow browser automation (not even in the "disable-default-extensions.patch"). What I'm basically asking: can you possibly point me to which patches I should disable to get Selenium to work with inox?

EDIT: It seems to possible be inox ignoring the "--port" CLI argument passed to it? Any info on that?

Last edited by cryzed (2016-11-15 10:29:43)

Wilco

Member

Registered: 2008-11-09

Posts: 440

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Been using version 54 for a while now with the Inox patches. To use the new version, I had to change the duckduckgo patch (lots of new small space newline changes) and the patch to disable default extensions.

fallen1011

Member

Registered: 2012-08-03

Posts: 38

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

removed

Last edited by fallen1011 (2017-09-07 03:31:24)

Perfect Gentleman

Member

Registered: 2012-10-25

Posts: 222

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Been using version 54 for a while now with the Inox patches. To use the new version, I had to change the duckduckgo patch (lots of new small space newline changes) and the patch to disable default extensions.

could you pull request  of those updated patches ?

stabwound

Member

Registered: 2015-07-24

Posts: 48

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Hi, thanks for this great project!

I have a problem though: is there a way to make Inox stop complaining about non HTTPS sites? For me it breaks CSS a lot of the time, especially when browsing sites like Amazon. It simply won't load the css.

Any advice?

stabwound

Member

Registered: 2015-07-24

Posts: 48

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Anyone have any clue how to fix this CSS problem? It's making Inox basically unusuable to me.

rEnr3n

Member

Registered: 2012-07-25

Posts: 39

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

@stabwound The update should fix it. If not clear your cache.

stabwound

Member

Registered: 2015-07-24

Posts: 48

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Thank you! You're right.

SPECIAL

Member

Registered: 2017-03-20

Posts: 1

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Firstly, nice browser, thank you for your work!
One idea: can you add "ungoogled-chromium" patches here? Its description looks nice, not bad improving of security from Iridium project and some noname guys. But installing it means trusting some unknown people, it will be really cool if you check it and add to your project.

sekret

Member

Registered: 2013-07-22

Posts: 289

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

With latest inox-bin, I get this message upon start:

$ inox
/usr/lib/inox/inox: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/inox/inox: undefined symbol: uidna_labelToUnicode_58

$  pacman -Qi inox-bin | grep Version
Version         : 57.0.2987.98-1

What's wrong here?

Shadowdodger2

Member

Registered: 2015-11-05

Posts: 9

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

@gcarq
Inox browser stopped working suddenly and I'm getting the following error message:

Chromium is working fine however.

Last edited by Shadowdodger2 (2017-05-04 12:32:17)

xsmile

Member

Registered: 2012-03-31

Posts: 32

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Prevent icu from being treated as a system library by commenting the relevant line in the PKGBUILD and recompile it.

Shadowdodger2

Member

Registered: 2015-11-05

Posts: 9

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Prevent icu from being treated as a system library by commenting the relevant line in the PKGBUILD and recompile it.

How would I do that without breaking my system?

xsmile

Member

Registered: 2012-03-31

Posts: 32

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Comment line 13 in the current PKGBUILD of inox, build and install it.

Shadowdodger2

Member

Registered: 2015-11-05

Posts: 9

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

An update is needed.

teckk

Member

Registered: 2013-02-21

Posts: 524

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/inox-bin/

Read the comments

Shadowdodger2

Member

Registered: 2015-11-05

Posts: 9

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Another update is needed.

WorMzy

Administrator

From: Scotland

Registered: 2010-06-16

Posts: 12,403

Website

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

That was already reported on the AUR page, and the maintainer has already responded. By the look of it, the same was true the last time you posted this sort of message. Don't do this again.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Co … mpty_posts

Also, stop posting images of text.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Co … s_and_code

---

Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD

Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.

Shadowdodger2

Member

Registered: 2015-11-05

Posts: 9

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

I will only report errors to the AUR page from now on.