You are not logged in.

#126 2016-08-12 12:05:02

halocaridina
Member
From: US
Registered: 2014-07-21
Posts: 55

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Could the AUR inox-bin package be rebuilt? A rebuild is needed since the libvpx 1.6.0-2 update ~ 08/05/16 causes inox-bin to fail with:

/usr/lib/inox/inox: error while loading shared libraries: libvpx.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Thank you!!


4X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 @ 2.40GHz; 256GiB; 11TB EXT4; SL6.7
2X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz; 256GiB; 3.4TB EXT4; SL6.7
Latitude 3150; Pentium N3540; 8GiB, 525GB Crucial_CT525MX3; Arch
Thinkpad T440S; Haswell-ULT Core i7; 12GiB, 512GB SanDisk X210; Arch

Offline

#127 2016-09-03 15:25:27

gcarq
Member
From: Austria
Registered: 2013-10-07
Posts: 40

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Released version 53.0.2785.89 with a new icon set smile

Offline

#128 2016-09-05 13:14:03

halocaridina
Member
From: US
Registered: 2014-07-21
Posts: 55

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Update much appreciated, thank you!


4X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 @ 2.40GHz; 256GiB; 11TB EXT4; SL6.7
2X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz; 256GiB; 3.4TB EXT4; SL6.7
Latitude 3150; Pentium N3540; 8GiB, 525GB Crucial_CT525MX3; Arch
Thinkpad T440S; Haswell-ULT Core i7; 12GiB, 512GB SanDisk X210; Arch

Offline

#129 2016-11-07 12:46:52

halocaridina
Member
From: US
Registered: 2014-07-21
Posts: 55

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

@gcarq

Hope this finds you well. Is there an ETA for the next release of inox/inox-bin?

Thanks again for maintaining this great browser,

Halocaridina


4X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 @ 2.40GHz; 256GiB; 11TB EXT4; SL6.7
2X Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz; 256GiB; 3.4TB EXT4; SL6.7
Latitude 3150; Pentium N3540; 8GiB, 525GB Crucial_CT525MX3; Arch
Thinkpad T440S; Haswell-ULT Core i7; 12GiB, 512GB SanDisk X210; Arch

Offline

#130 2016-11-13 19:27:12

patlux
Member
Registered: 2015-03-19
Posts: 3

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

https://sslmate.com/blog/post/ct_redaction_in_chrome_53

Due to a bug in Chrome, versions of Chrome 53 that are more than 10 weeks old now display this error message for all websites using Symantec certificates that were issued on or after June 1, 2016

sad

Thank you for this great browser!

Patrick

/ Edit:

website visitors can simply restart Chrome to avoid the bug

smile

Last edited by patlux (2016-11-13 19:40:46)


const patrick = { aurgithubdotfiles };

Offline

#131 2016-11-15 10:17:49

cryzed
Member
Registered: 2010-05-11
Posts: 8

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

I'm trying to use inox with Selenium, by adjusting the executable path and options accordingly when starting the webdriver. When using Selenium with Chromium the browser starts, an extension called "Chrome Automation Extension" automatically appears in the list and the instance is automatable with Selenium, however when done so with inox the browser starts and the extension appears, however a timeout error in Selenium occurs while waiting for the service to respond. (Manually installing chromedriver is required for inox, since it doesn't ship with it as it does with Chromium).

I checked the various patches, but couldn't find anything obvious in them that might explain the timeout, i.e. you specifically disabling the features that would allow browser automation (not even in the "disable-default-extensions.patch"). What I'm basically asking: can you possibly point me to which patches I should disable to get Selenium to work with inox?

EDIT: It seems to possible be inox ignoring the "--port" CLI argument passed to it? Any info on that?

Last edited by cryzed (2016-11-15 10:29:43)

Offline

#132 2016-11-16 13:03:46

Wilco
Member
Registered: 2008-11-09
Posts: 435

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Been using version 54 for a while now with the Inox patches. To use the new version, I had to change the duckduckgo patch (lots of new small space newline changes) and the patch to disable default extensions.

Offline

#133 2016-11-19 17:07:32

fallen1011
Member
Registered: 2012-08-03
Posts: 38

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

the one thing that kills me is i cannot install apps. i need signal app. yes you can install extensions, but not apps :-/.

Offline

#134 2016-11-22 12:52:28

Perfect Gentleman
Member
Registered: 2012-10-25
Posts: 221

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Wilco wrote:

Been using version 54 for a while now with the Inox patches. To use the new version, I had to change the duckduckgo patch (lots of new small space newline changes) and the patch to disable default extensions.

could you pull request  of those updated patches ?

Offline

#135 2016-11-24 21:48:20

stabwound
Member
Registered: 2015-07-24
Posts: 37

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Hi, thanks for this great project!

I have a problem though: is there a way to make Inox stop complaining about non HTTPS sites? For me it breaks CSS a lot of the time, especially when browsing sites like Amazon. It simply won't load the css.

Any advice?

Offline

#136 2016-11-29 04:08:59

stabwound
Member
Registered: 2015-07-24
Posts: 37

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Anyone have any clue how to fix this CSS problem? It's making Inox basically unusuable to me.

Offline

#137 2016-11-29 11:13:17

rEnr3n
Member
Registered: 2012-07-25
Posts: 29

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

@stabwound The update should fix it. If not clear your cache.


180 documentaries to expand your mind - http://higherperspectives.com/documentaries/

Offline

#138 2016-11-29 20:19:42

stabwound
Member
Registered: 2015-07-24
Posts: 37

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Thank you! You're right.

Offline

#139 2017-03-20 11:23:38

SPECIAL
Member
Registered: 2017-03-20
Posts: 1

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

Firstly, nice browser, thank you for your work!
One idea: can you add "ungoogled-chromium" patches here? Its description looks nice, not bad improving of security from Iridium project and some noname guys. But installing it means trusting some unknown people, it will be really cool if you check it and add to your project.

Offline

#140 2017-03-23 21:49:04

sekret
Member
Registered: 2013-07-22
Posts: 210

Re: Inox Browser - yet another Chromium Privacy Spin-off

With latest inox-bin, I get this message upon start:

$ inox
/usr/lib/inox/inox: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/inox/inox: undefined symbol: uidna_labelToUnicode_58
$  pacman -Qi inox-bin | grep Version
Version         : 57.0.2987.98-1

What's wrong here?

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB