You are not logged in.
Hello mates,
I don't know if I should put my computer in a dmz because it look more secure than my very old and basic router (~2007)
[root@archlinux]: /home/xxxxxx># nmap 192.168.0.0/24
Starting Nmap 7.70 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2020-04-06 03:22 AKDT
Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.254
Host is up (0.0011s latency).
Not shown: 997 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
554/tcp open rtsp
9100/tcp open jetdirect
MAC Address: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (Freebox SAS)
Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.12
Host is up (0.000019s latency).
All 1000 scanned ports on 192.168.0.12 are closed
Nmap done: 256 IP addresses (2 hosts up) scanned in 26.64 seconds
I very new on linux so I you want more informations to help me or if you have tips, do not hesitate mates
And thank you so much for help
Offline
I don't know if I should put my computer in a dmz because it look more secure than my very old and basic router (~2007)
What object would be more secure in the DMZ? Where is it currently? From what would it be more secure?
Last edited by loqs (2020-04-06 20:12:47)
Offline
I don't know if I should put my computer in a dmz because it look more secure than my very old and basic router (~2007)
No.
The DMZ puts your machine on the wrong side of the firewall and exposes it to direct attack from the public internet.
Last edited by ewaller (2020-04-07 14:37:42)
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine. -- Alan Turing
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
Thank you ewaller
SOLVED
Last edited by Momoleraclo (2020-04-07 10:37:31)
Offline