You are not logged in.
i use network manager to automatically configure my wired/wireless however my connection experiences extreme throttling when i test mt internet speed through sites or tui tools i get a solid ~80mb/s on download meanwhile when i download an actual file (not necessary a package even from the browser its slow) i can expect 500kb/s on a good day weirdly however sites still load relatively fast downloads suffer
Last edited by shaked (2022-01-23 23:00:36)
Offline
Install iperf3 or ookla-speedtest choose different server and make a constancy test.
With poor routing of ISP are such behaviour hood possible. In which country are you? Have you packet loss with ping to different sites?
Last edited by Morta (2022-01-23 23:40:11)
Offline
Have you rebooted both your router and computer?
No better, then reset your router to the factory default.
Is your router's firmware up to date?
Have you tested your computer on a different network, or with a different router?
Have you tested your computer on different live boot environments?
Offline
What about those actual downloads?
https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/how-to-use-wget/
Offline
What about those actual downloads?
https://www.linode.com/docs/guides/how-to-use-wget/
shaked@leno-e31 ~]$ wget http://speedtest.newark.linode.com/100MB-newark.bin
--2022-01-24 15:17:33-- http://speedtest.newark.linode.com/100MB-newark.bin
Resolving speedtest.newark.linode.com (speedtest.newark.linode.com)... 2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:feae:65e, 50.116.57.237
Connecting to speedtest.newark.linode.com (speedtest.newark.linode.com)|2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:feae:65e|:80... failed: Connection timed out.
Connecting to speedtest.newark.linode.com (speedtest.newark.linode.com)|50.116.57.237|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: ‘100MB-newark.bin’
100MB-newark.bin 100%[===================>] 100.00M 200KB/s in 10m 0s
2022-01-24 15:29:43 (171 KB/s) - ‘100MB-newark.bin’ saved [104857600/104857600]
[shaked@leno-e31 ~]$
Offline
In which country are you?
Is Newark anywhere close to you? From the image in the OP, Israel?
Here's a script for the various linode servers: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 6#p2017886
Try one to the west and one to the east (Frankfurt and perhaps Bombay?) - and ideally another system in the LAN.
Offline
@shaked: In your Bezeq speed test please switch to "Connections: Single".
Offline
@shaked: In your Bezeq speed test please switch to "Connections: Single".
Offline
Morta wrote:In which country are you?
Is Newark anywhere close to you? From the image in the OP, Israel?
Here's a script for the various linode servers: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 6#p2017886
Try one to the west and one to the east (Frankfurt and perhaps Bombay?) - and ideally another system in the LAN.
1. Newark, USA
2. Singapore
3. London, UK
4. Frankfurt, Deutschland
5. Dallas, USA
6. Toronto, Canada
7. Sidney, Australia
8. Atlanta, USA
9. 東京都 (Tokyo), 日本国 (Japan)
10. मुंबई (Bombay), Bhārat (India)
11. Fremont, USA
Enter location: 4
1. 100MB
2. 1GB
Slect size: 1
failed: Connection timed out.
/dev/null 100%[===================>] 100.00M 96.7KB/s in 14m 29s
2022-01-24 18:50:35 URL:http://speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com/100MB-frankfurt.bin [104857600/104857600] -> "/dev/null" [1]
[shaked@leno-e31 Desktop]$
Offline
@shaked: Just what I expected. The standard speed test (with multiple connections) misleads you to think your download speed (which is normally a single HTTP(S) or FTP(S) connection) can reach these levels. It can't - your single connection bandwidth is limited.
If you want to verify this, try downloading a file via BitTorrent (which uses multiple connections) - if your chosen download has several BitTorrent peers you will see faster download speeds.
Offline
His downloads for the linode testfiles are 200kB and 100kB - that's abysmal and meets the poor windows iso download speed at 460kB - but I also doubt that this has anything to do w/ the wifi and all with his ISP.
@shaked, try downloading from another system in the LAN.
Offline
His downloads for the linode testfiles are 200kB and 100kB - that's abysmal and meets the poor windows iso download speed at 460kB - but I also doubt that this has anything to do w/ the wifi and all with his ISP.
@shaked, try downloading from another system in the LAN.
from a windows 10 pc on the smae network (same modem and router)
https://imgur.com/a/udURirz (video) miles ahead of my laptop
however then i decided to try WSL and this is what i get:
wsl@DESKTOP-ESRUHJR:/mnt/c/Users/empire of cats$ ./speedtest.txt
1. Newark, USA
2. Singapore
3. London, UK
4. Frankfurt, Deutschland
5. Dallas, USA
6. Toronto, Canada
7. Sidney, Australia
8. Atlanta, USA
9. 東京都 (Tokyo), 日本国 (Japan)
10. मुंबई (Bombay), Bhārat (India)
11. Fremont, USA
Enter location: 4
1. 100MB
2. 1GB
Slect size: 1
failed: Resource temporarily unavailable.
/dev/null 100%[=================================================>] 100.00M 171KB/s in 10m 13s
2022-01-24 22:57:29 URL:http://speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com/100MB-frankfurt.bin [104857600/104857600] -> "/dev/null" [1]
wsl@DESKTOP-ESRUHJR:/mnt/c/Users/empire of cats$
Last edited by shaked (2022-01-24 20:58:21)
Offline
same modem and router
… and some unknown CDN…
The idea was to measure the download from that windows system (or any other) to the archlinux system to test your wifi rather than the internet connection.
Since you've the same problems w/ WSL it's actually even less likely that this has anything to do w/ the wifi - how does the librewolf download perform on the linux system and how fast can windows download http://speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com/1 … nkfurt.bin ?
Offline
i dont know how to check the download speed of librewolf because its an aur package as for the windows pc it doesnt accept .bin as a valid way to end the url 404 Not Found nginx (chrome)
the issue didn't appear immidiatly after installing arch when i installed the desktop enviroment i had ~1mb/s download however i do have an error message relating to bad connection when trying to install some other aur package that used to work for me
[shaked@lenoE31 ~]$ yay -S whatsapp-nativefier
:: Checking for conflicts...
:: Checking for inner conflicts...
[Aur:1] whatsapp-nativefier-2.2142.12-1
[Aur Make:1] nodejs-nativefier-46.0.4-1
==> Remove make dependencies after install? [y/N] n
2 nodejs-nativefier (Build Files Exist)
1 whatsapp-nativefier (Build Files Exist)
==> Packages to cleanBuild?
==> [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]tInstalled or (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4)
==>
:: PKGBUILD up to date, Skipping (2/0): nodejs-nativefier, whatsapp-nativefier
2 nodejs-nativefier (Build Files Exist)
1 whatsapp-nativefier (Build Files Exist)
==> Diffs to show?
==> [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]tInstalled or (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4)
==>
:: (1/2) Parsing SRCINFO: nodejs-nativefier
:: (2/2) Parsing SRCINFO: whatsapp-nativefier
==> Making package: nodejs-nativefier 46.0.4-1 (Fri 21 Jan 2022 01:50:23 PM IST)
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found nodejs-nativefier-46.0.4.tgz
==> Validating source files with sha1sums...
nodejs-nativefier-46.0.4.tgz ... Passed
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
nodejs-nativefier-46.0.4.tgz ... Passed
==> Making package: whatsapp-nativefier 2.2142.12-1 (Fri 21 Jan 2022 01:50:24 PM IST)
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found whatsapp-nativefier.png
-> Found whatsapp-nativefier.desktop
-> Found whatsapp-nativefier-inject.js
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
whatsapp-nativefier.png ... Passed
whatsapp-nativefier.desktop ... Passed
whatsapp-nativefier-inject.js ... Passed
==> Making package: nodejs-nativefier 46.0.4-1 (Fri 21 Jan 2022 01:50:25 PM IST)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found nodejs-nativefier-46.0.4.tgz
==> Validating source files with sha1sums...
nodejs-nativefier-46.0.4.tgz ... Passed
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
nodejs-nativefier-46.0.4.tgz ... Passed
==> Removing existing $srcdir/ directory...
==> Extracting sources...
==> Starting prepare()...
package/LICENSE.md
==> Sources are ready.
==> Making package: nodejs-nativefier 46.0.4-1 (Fri 21 Jan 2022 01:50:26 PM IST)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> WARNING: Using existing $srcdir/ tree
==> Removing existing $pkgdir/ directory...
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting package()...
npm ERR! code ETIMEDOUT
npm ERR! syscall connect
npm ERR! errno ETIMEDOUT
npm ERR! network request to https://registry.npmjs.org/axios failed, reason: connect ETIMEDOUT 2606:4700::6810:1923:443
npm ERR! network This is a problem related to network connectivity.
npm ERR! network In most cases you are behind a proxy or have bad network settings.
npm ERR! network
npm ERR! network If you are behind a proxy, please make sure that the
npm ERR! network 'proxy' config is set properly. See: 'npm help config'
npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
npm ERR! /home/shaked/.cache/yay/nodejs-nativefier/src/npm-cache/_logs/2022-01-21T11_50_27_787Z-debug-0.log
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting...
-> error making: nodejs-nativefier
[shaked@lenoE31 ~]$
Offline
You open your browser in linux, navigate to that same webpage and click the same download button. You're not supposed to install any of that, you just want to know how fast you can download that file from that server.
as for the windows pc it doesnt accept .bin as a valid way to end the url 404 Not Found nginx (chrome)
404 isn't from windows, but the server - it means that you typo'd the url.
And once more: the most important test would be to measure the throughput in the LAN.
Offline
404 isn't from windows, but the server - it means that you typo'd the url.
you are right it didn't start the download by right clicking on the windows pc so i copy pasted it into the url i now did it properly (inspect element and get the link)
and how fast can windows download http://speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com/1 … nkfurt.bin ?
it downloads pretty slow ~15m eta i think the linode server might be the bottleneck here unfortunatly i dont know how to get the exact properties of the download
created: Monday, January 24, 2022, 11:39:37 PM
modified: Monday, January 24, 2022, 11:48:17 PM (when i opened it)
Last edited by shaked (2022-01-24 21:56:40)
Offline
The linode server is rather not the bottleneck, but your connection to it (and several other segments on the internet) is.
Maybe we can see where it breaks down:
tracepath speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com
Offline
The linode server is rather not the bottleneck, but your connection to it (and several other segments on the internet) is.
Maybe we can see where it breaks down:tracepath speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com
shaked@leno-e31 ~]$ tracepath speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com
1?: [LOCALHOST] 0.025ms pmtu 1500
1: 2a10:8000:6c0c:f000:52c7:bfff:fe35:60a4 2.178ms
1: 2a10:8000:6c0c:f000:52c7:bfff:fe35:60a4 0.648ms
and a bunch of no reply
Offline
Anything better w/ "tracepath -4"?
You might want to just https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/IPv6#Disable_IPv6
Offline
Anything better w/ "tracepath -4"?
You might want to just https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/IPv6#Disable_IPv6
looks much better
[shaked@leno-e31 ~]$ tracepath -4 speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com
1?: [LOCALHOST] pmtu 1500
1: _gateway 0.596ms
1: _gateway 0.628ms
2: 192.168.1.1 1.304ms
3: 10.206.128.1 11.492ms
4: no reply
5: 172.17.5.122 13.132ms asymm 11
6: no reply
7: bzq-25-116-145.cust.bezeqint.net 20.667ms asymm 10
8: 10.25.19.10 13.865ms asymm 10
9: bzq-25-77-14.cust.bezeqint.net 69.673ms asymm 17
10: bzq-179-124-134.cust.bezeqint.net 68.878ms asymm 14
11: 195.66.225.73 67.366ms asymm 14
12: 195.66.225.73 68.832ms asymm 14
13: 195.66.225.73 69.658ms asymm 14
14: if-4-4.router2-fra.linode.com 71.383ms asymm 15
15: speedtest.frankfurt.linode.com 75.220ms reached
Resume: pmtu 1500 hops 15 back 16
Offline
It's not really fast (see the bezeqint.net timeouts) but at least not breaking away.
Try to disable IPv6, see whether that improves your downloads - otherwise tell your ISP that they're worse than vodafone.
Offline
It's not really fast (see the bezeqint.net timeouts) but at least not breaking away.
Try to disable IPv6, see whether that improves your downloads - otherwise tell your ISP that they're worse than vodafone.
disabled IPv6 connection is still miserably low
bezeq -> lightning bolt in the sense of how fast it is
Last edited by shaked (2022-01-24 23:07:23)
Offline
www.bezeq.co.il times out for me, I can reach www.bezeqint.net, though (and the www.bezeq.co.il connection is routed through some *.bezeqint.net domains)
Try
wget -O /dev/null www.bezeq.co.il
but I'm more than convinced that this is a routing problem of your ISP.
Offline
Try
wget -O /dev/null www.bezeq.co.il
but I'm more than convinced that this is a routing problem of your ISP.
[shaked@leno-e31 ~]$ wget -O /dev/null www.bezeq.co.il
--2022-01-25 12:22:37-- http://www.bezeq.co.il/
Resolving www.bezeq.co.il (www.bezeq.co.il)... 147.235.237.34
Connecting to www.bezeq.co.il (www.bezeq.co.il)|147.235.237.34|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location: https://www.bezeq.co.il/ [following]
--2022-01-25 12:22:37-- https://www.bezeq.co.il/
SSL_INIT
Loaded CA certificate '/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt'
Connecting to www.bezeq.co.il (www.bezeq.co.il)|147.235.237.34|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 232746 (227K) [text/html]
Saving to: ‘/dev/null’
/dev/null 100%[===================>] 227.29K --.-KB/s in 0.1s
2022-01-25 12:22:38 (2.27 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [232746/232746]
it was very quick
Last edited by shaked (2022-01-25 10:26:05)
Offline
Yes. It's your ISPs routing (though I can actually reach the co.il on 147.235.244.6 now at 534KB/s)
I'm pretty sure there's no actual problem w/ your WLAN or linux or any problem on your side.
Offline