You are not logged in.
Hello and thanks in advance.
I've installed lynx/w3m/and irssi and all three gave me the same error
/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.3: version 'OPENSSL_3.0.0' not found (required by irssi)
/usr/lib/libssl.so.3: version 'OPENSSL_3.0.0' not found (required by irssi)
I attemped to modify links in an attempt to fix, I've done much searching and can not find a solution.
I'm all ears if anyone has any ideas for me.
Last edited by dad2four (2022-11-13 19:43:27)
Offline
pacman -Syu
Offline
I attemped to modify links in an attempt to fix
That's a sure-fire way to break your system even more than you've already broken it.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=130309
Read the second bolded line.
Offline
Thanks for your help. I ran pacman -Syu failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.3 exists in filesystem and the same with libssl. no packages were upgraded due to the errors.
Offline
That's because you broke your system even more by symlinking libraries.
Undo your attempted 'fix' and then update your system properly.
Offline
I have no idea how to reverse what I did. if I ls -l libssl* in the /usr/lib directory I show
libssl3.so
libssl.so.1.1
libssl.so.3 -> libssl3.so
Does this look correct?
Offline
I have no idea how to reverse what I did.
Then post your shell history for the commands that you ran.
Offline
Totally cool, had no idea history would stick around after reboots.
I'm looking at history but I can't post since I have no browser/email etc yet. I've just installed arch and am trying to get things going.
I'm on a different machine accessing the forum.
Offline
Does this look correct?
pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libssl3.so /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1
Does it?
I can't post since I have no browser/email
1st link below.
Offline
pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libssl3.so /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1
returns
/usr/lib/libssl3.so is owned by nss 3.84-1
/usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1 is owned by openssl 1.1.1.q-1
I'm working on uploading history
Offline
I know what that returns - the question for you was whether it looks correct to symlink libssl.so.whatever at libssl3.so …
Offline
Offline
If there is supposed to be a link from /usr/lib/libssl3.so to /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.1 then no it does not look correct to me.
Offline
I would think that we need a link from libssl.so -> libssl3.so
Offline
Stop using `-Sy $package` it breaks things.
Offline
Stop using `-Sy $package` it breaks things.
Ok I won't do it again
Offline
I would think that we need a link from libssl.so -> libssl3.so
Was this incorrect?
Offline
Yes that was incorrect. Remove *all* the links you've manually created. Then update your system properly.
Last edited by Trilby (2022-11-13 22:32:53)
"UNIX is simple and coherent..." - Dennis Ritchie, "GNU's Not UNIX" - Richard Stallman
Online
Yes that was incorrect. Remove *all* the links you've manually created. Then update your system properly.
Does "update your system properly mean pacman -Syu ?
Offline
I don't want to mess this up any worse than I have.
Offline
Trilby wrote:Yes that was incorrect. Remove *all* the links you've manually created. Then update your system properly.
Does "update your system properly mean pacman -Syu ?
Yes.
CLI Paste | How To Ask Questions
Arch Linux | x86_64 | GPT | EFI boot | refind | stub loader | systemd | LVM2 on LUKS
Lenovo x270 | Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz | Intel Wireless 8265/8275 | US keyboard w/ Euro | 512G NVMe INTEL SSDPEKKF512G7L
Offline
Thanks to all of you that helped me on this. All is well now.
Happy Thanksgiving!
Offline
Please always remember to mark resolved threads by editing your initial posts subject - so others will know that there's no task left, but maybe a solution to find.
Thanks.
Offline