You are not logged in.
I tried it, but it totally took a dump on my HD 3100. When X started, I just saw a distorted memory of my BIOS' boot image repeating across the top fourth of the screen, and everything else black. It was running, because the start-up sound played, even though I could not see anything. When I tried to switch to the console, the computer instantly shut went off. Tried it twice more, but got the same result, so downgraded back to 8.11.
Last edited by Wintervenom (2009-01-25 22:28:35)
Offline
Alright. 9.1 is out. Video playback using composite is still kind of funky.
Offline
Alright. 9.1 is out. Video playback using composite is still kind of funky.
Disable regex matching in compiz or change the video output mode of media players from xv to x11
Last edited by Kilz (2009-01-29 21:32:56)
I trust Microsoft about as far as I can comfortably spit a dead rat.
Cinnamon is a wonderful desktop
"Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."
Offline
9.1 there now.
Maybe my radeon 9600 card will work better than with fglrx on the other machine
Fustrated Windows users have two options.
1. Resort to the throwing of computers out of windows.
2. Resort to the throwing of windows out of computers.
Offline
9.1 there now.
Maybe my radeon 9600 card will work better than with fglrx on the other machine
Your 9600 will FLY if you install xf86-video-ati.
Fglrx is one of the worst software examples out there.
Offline
Raccoon1400 wrote:9.1 there now.
Maybe my radeon 9600 card will work better than with fglrx on the other machineYour 9600 will FLY if you install xf86-video-ati.
Fglrx is one of the worst software examples out there.
when I installed fglrx, the first thing it did was break every game that required good graphics
Fustrated Windows users have two options.
1. Resort to the throwing of computers out of windows.
2. Resort to the throwing of windows out of computers.
Offline
flamelab wrote:Raccoon1400 wrote:9.1 there now.
Maybe my radeon 9600 card will work better than with fglrx on the other machineYour 9600 will FLY if you install xf86-video-ati.
Fglrx is one of the worst software examples out there.
when I installed fglrx, the first thing it did was break every game that required good graphics
Installed catalyst, breaks everything too
Fustrated Windows users have two options.
1. Resort to the throwing of computers out of windows.
2. Resort to the throwing of windows out of computers.
Offline
Raccoon1400 wrote:when I installed fglrx, the first thing it did was break every game that required good graphics
Installed catalyst, breaks everything too
fglrx IS Catalyst... Well, more accurately, Catalyst is a set of driver stuff, fglrx is the name of the core driver component for Linux, which is part of Linux Catalyst.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fglrx
Check the version numbers.
Offline
I'm using Catalyst/fglrx right now with my HD4850 and for some reason when I resize windows it takes a second to show what is being done, whereas with my 7600GT this was not an issue. Is there something I should know about, or does this happen to everyone?
e:Dangit typos...
Last edited by elmer_42 (2009-01-30 04:02:29)
[ lamy + pilot ] [ arch64 | wmii ] [ ati + amd ]
Offline
fglrx drivers have famously terrible 2D support. I believe I've heard that issue before.
Not sure if xf86-video-radeonhd supports your card with accelerated 2D yet... don't think so. Hopefully soon, and 3D support to get better. For those GPUs it does work with, RadeonHD's 2D is very good and constantly improving. www.phoronix.com has more info.
News for everyone here that should address a big problem: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a … t_91&num=1
Offline
Well, as long as it's not just me, I'm fine with it for now. But how bad is the 3D in xf86? If it's good enough to get respectable frame rates in Nexuiz, I'll use it, but if not I definitely won't.
[ lamy + pilot ] [ arch64 | wmii ] [ ati + amd ]
Offline
@flamelab: X11 video works just fine. I just wish I could use Xv. Sometimes when I use X11 the video won't resize correctly :-/
Peter
Offline
slow window resize
Should turn off compositing in xorg, everything will be fine.
Its a driver problem, I'm still hoping they would fix it
Xyne wrote:
"We've got Pacman. Wacka wacka, bitches!"
Offline
@flamelab: X11 video works just fine. I just wish I could use Xv. Sometimes when I use X11 the video won't resize correctly :-/
Peter
Τhis is my device section in xorg.conf:
Section "Device"
Identifier "My Graphics Card"
Driver "radeon"
Option "DynamicClocks" "on"
Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
Option "EXAVSync" "on"
Option "DMAForXv" "on"
Option "ScalerWidth" "1920"
Option "EnablePageFlip" "on"
Option "RenderAccel" "on"
Option "AccelDFS" "on"
Option "ColorTiling" "on"
BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection
Last edited by flamelab (2009-01-30 12:43:16)
Offline
Ey, this 9.1 was supposed to be the end of all problems with Compiz i have been waiting for... Isn't it?
Stop the world, I get off...
Offline
[T]urn off compositing in xorg, everything will be fine.
Oh, cool. Thanks.
e:But now xcompmgr can't do it's thing. I guess it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make, though. =/
Last edited by elmer_42 (2009-01-30 15:00:56)
[ lamy + pilot ] [ arch64 | wmii ] [ ati + amd ]
Offline
Catalyst 9.1 seems to have some fixes for compositing, look forward to it in the Arch repos
But how bad is the 3D in xf86? If it's good enough to get respectable frame rates in Nexuiz, I'll use it, but if not I definitely won't.
xf86-video-radeonhd doesn't support your card well yet (http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a … onhd_rv770) - it'll work, but only using software 2D rendering (I think). 3D is glitchy and odd for all cards with radeonhd right now. You can try xf86-video-ati - I can
t find much info at all on it with your card.
Offline
umm 9.1 isnt working here. at least, the driver loads, but 2D is slow to the extreme and 3D direct rendering is non existant. glxgears/glxinfo both spew an error about X 'BadRequest' or something ..
maybe i need to update more than just catalyst for this release ?
I run: kernel 2.6.28.2, xorg-server 1.5.3-4, mesa 7.2
not that i really have any high hopes for this release .. the 'latest' config that runs decently here is 2.6.27 + xorg 1.4.2 + catalyst[-utils] 8.8 .....
chupocabra ... psupsuspsu psu psu
Offline
9-1 is broken on x86_64:
(EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib64/dri/fglrx_dri.so failed (/usr/lib64/dri/fglrx_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)
(EE) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering
the path is hardcoded in the precompiled libglx.so. this is all i found so far: http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?p=59685 - the recommended sed changes the path but makes the lib loading fail and a symlink is a NoGo!
I asked on the AMD list how to deal this. Maybe somebody has a suggestion here.
Offline
9-1 is broken on x86_64:
(EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib64/dri/fglrx_dri.so failed (/usr/lib64/dri/fglrx_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)
(EE) AIGLX: reverting to software renderingthe path is hardcoded in the precompiled libglx.so. this is all i found so far: http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?p=59685 - the recommended sed changes the path but makes the lib loading fail and a symlink is a NoGo!
I asked on the AMD list how to deal this. Maybe somebody has a suggestion here.
Well I just created the symlink while waiting for someone to post...
mkdir /usr/lib64/dri/
ln -s /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so .
Works!
So seems like a good driver:
-Video kinda works without flicker with kde composite (desktop effects), it crops a bit.
-2D seems to have a (placebo?) speedup effect
-composite window resizing is horribly slow, without composite from fast to ok depending on app
-composite firefox scrolling = ok
-only 1 X instance seems to be running now?
-glxgears 54118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10823.455 FPS
gotta see if tvout works and if changing settings in amdcccle still make x freeze on start
EDIT: OH! DUH! specs 64bit arch and radeon 4850
EDIT2: tvout works, changing settings doesnt only freeze X on startup but logout too ^^
Last edited by Mikko777 (2009-01-30 21:31:06)
Offline
Catalyst 9.1 is still causing a panic that locks the system after the X server is restarted, for me.
Back to 8.11 I go...
Last edited by Wintervenom (2009-01-31 02:57:34)
Offline
I'm using Catalyst/fglrx right now with my HD4850 and for some reason when I resize windows it takes a second to show what is being done, whereas with my 7600GT this was not an issue. Is there something I should know about, or does this happen to everyone?
e:Dangit typos...
If you have compiz installed you can change the way the way the window resize is done. I changed the Resize Window > General tab > Default Resize mode to Rectangle in the compiz settings.
What this changes is when you try and resize the window a colored rectangle representing the desired size. Its faster and works better especially on media players showing video.
Last edited by Kilz (2009-01-31 03:34:36)
I trust Microsoft about as far as I can comfortably spit a dead rat.
Cinnamon is a wonderful desktop
"Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."
Offline
Nope, I'm not using Compiz, but thanks for the suggestion.
[ lamy + pilot ] [ arch64 | wmii ] [ ati + amd ]
Offline
Most WMs should let you change how windows are resized, even if it's buried in config files... worst case, use a WM like Openbox that only offers a transparent rectangle.
Offline
Catalyst 9.1 is still causing a panic that locks the system after the X server is restarted, for me.
Back to 8.11 I go...
Yup, same experience. Stick with 8.11
By the way, how is composite manager with 8.11 working?
Archlinux x86_64 on Thinkpad T400
Intel X4500MHD / ATI HD3470 Graphics, 2G RAM, 160G HD
Offline