You are not logged in.

#1 2009-11-26 09:25:22

batis
Member
Registered: 2009-11-26
Posts: 3

New Arch version

When we can expect new version of Arch?

Offline

#2 2009-11-26 09:44:32

SoleSoul
Member
From: Israel
Registered: 2009-06-29
Posts: 319

Re: New Arch version

There are no versions. It's rolling release.

EDIT: I changed the reply to be much more polite... sorry.

Last edited by SoleSoul (2009-11-26 10:04:27)

Offline

#3 2009-11-26 10:02:05

flamelab
Member
From: Athens, Hellas (Greece)
Registered: 2007-12-26
Posts: 2,160

Re: New Arch version

batis wrote:

When we can expect new version of Arch?

I guess you mean "snapshot" ? By February-March I guess.

Offline

#4 2009-11-26 10:10:31

.:B:.
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2006-11-26
Posts: 5,819
Website

Re: New Arch version

There is no point in a 'new version' other than installer improvements. You'll still install and sync to the most recent packages.


Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy

Offline

#5 2009-11-26 10:24:16

batis
Member
Registered: 2009-11-26
Posts: 3

Re: New Arch version

rolling release

sorry, my fault

well, i,ve got kernel panic, unable to mount root fs for i686 netinstall. tried every solution from here, no result.

Many thanks for answer

Last edited by batis (2009-11-26 10:30:07)

Offline

#6 2009-11-26 10:33:19

sHyLoCk
Member
From: /dev/null
Registered: 2009-06-19
Posts: 1,197

Re: New Arch version

You get that just after base install? Did you update your system?

Last edited by sHyLoCk (2009-11-26 10:33:28)


~ Regards,
sHy
ArchBang: Yet another Distro for Allan to break.
Blog | GIT | Forum (。◕‿◕。)

Offline

#7 2009-11-26 11:09:41

SoleSoul
Member
From: Israel
Registered: 2009-06-29
Posts: 319

Re: New Arch version

and make sure the line (in GRUB2)

linux /boot/vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sda5

points to the right root partition
(in GRUB "linux" is "kernel")

Offline

#8 2009-11-26 14:16:29

batis
Member
Registered: 2009-11-26
Posts: 3

Re: New Arch version

sHyLoCk wrote:

You get that just after base install?

Yes, it was as usually [net] base install (minus: ppp, rp-pppoe) and few base devel packages (plus: iwlwifi-5000-ucode, wireless-tools, netcfg) - provides to Kernel Panic.

sHyLoCk wrote:

Did you update your system?

Core install (2009.02) happily ended, but pacman -Syu - and the same Kernel Panic

Now I've got x86_64

Last edited by batis (2009-11-27 15:27:24)

Offline

#9 2009-11-27 21:38:16

Inxsible
Forum Fellow
From: Chicago
Registered: 2008-06-09
Posts: 9,183

Re: New Arch version

I still use the Arch CD that i made long long long back to install and then simply update the machine.

But the next time I am gonna try a netinst, just for the heck of it smile


Forum Rules

There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots !

Offline

#10 2009-11-29 14:44:42

JoshuaK
Member
From: Ohio, USA
Registered: 2008-09-13
Posts: 66
Website

Re: New Arch version

Meh, it don't really matter what snapshot you use. Sure, I mean, using the latest greatest is fine if you want ext4 support (been in there since 2009.02, which I just installed from Friday) or GRUB2 (is that in a snapshot yet?) then go ahead. But I just use whatever CD I find first (theyre all NetInstalls here) and go NetInstall, and it's up-to-date for me.

As for your error, perhaps it is an issue with your hardware configuration?


Meh has new account! This one left behind for history's sake...

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB