jumanji - a web browser

ablepharus · 2010-07-13 00:56:25

May he implemented that nice feature to bother you xD

Have you tried to add a new user without any settings?

Inxsible · 2010-07-13 01:03:11

I just realized what it is.

my i686 - which shows nice black background is using the AUR version which is 20100705-1

and my x64 machine is using the 20100710-1 which is newer, so I guess neldoreth put in that pink color between those 2 versions. Now if I can only find out which color field sets that, I should be good.

Off to looking into the config,h

karol · 2010-07-13 01:04:38

I think you can diff the sources.

ablepharus · 2010-07-13 01:32:09

Thanks for the tip i won't update now!

And a possibility to change the appearance would be very cool.

bangkok_manouel · 2010-07-13 03:24:06

http://git.pwmt.org/?p=jumanji.git;a=co … fd2101be37
you're my hero. thanks !

edit: BTW, I believe you are aware about this but hints are broken in latest git

Last edited by bangkok_manouel (2010-07-13 04:09:44)

neldoreth · 2010-07-13 06:08:29

Hello,

Inxsible wrote:

On the contrary the i686 shows black and x64 shows pink.

I guess you should update just both installations or the configuration files.

Best regards

Inxsible · 2010-07-13 06:23:18

neldoreth wrote:

Hello,
Inxsible wrote:
On the contrary the i686 shows black and x64 shows pink.
I guess you should update just both installations or the configuration files.
Best regards

I see you uploaded 20100713. Thanks. Finally got rid of the pink !!

EDIT : The AUR package still show 20100705-1 as the version number, which is clyde cannot see that an upgrade is available. neldoreth, would you be so kind to update the pkgver when you upgrade?

Thanks.

Last edited by Inxsible (2010-07-13 06:33:30)

Inxsible · 2010-07-13 06:40:18

bangkok_manouel wrote:

edit: BTW, I believe you are aware about this but hints are broken in latest git

I can confirm. f doesnt work but F still works.

karol · 2010-07-13 06:44:47

> neldoreth, would you be so kind to update the pkgver when you upgrade?
+2
And post a short comment so that folks who install manually are notified about the new version.

neldoreth · 2010-07-13 06:58:13

Hello,

karol wrote:

And post a short comment so that folks who install manually are notified about the new version.

So I would nearly have to upgrade the git package everyday and I have to admit, I am too lazy for that and I do not think this makes any sense.
Jumanji is under heavy development right now, so it is better to pull the repository in a while and later on there will be normal versions and when
those occur I will post about it like I did for zathura.

Best regards

karol · 2010-07-13 07:20:22

> So I would nearly have to upgrade the git package everyday and I have to admit, I am too lazy for that and I do not think this makes any sense.
I knew that you'd point that out ;P

Andrwe · 2010-07-13 08:12:20

bernarcher wrote:

This <tab> trick is interesting. VimNav hinting in Jumanji really does work this way but I would never have thought of this one. (How did you find out?)

I've started my 'bug searching and solution giving' system build into my hands.

bernarcher wrote:

Now to the main question of all: Why does it do so at all? (And don't answer 42!) I have no idea yet but eventually I might find out. So far I was planning to spend some weekend's spare time to probably get VimNav better integrated in Jumanji (hopefully).

The reason for this is very simple.
Because the keys are defined in the JS they are active only for the 'window'-element. This means that the 'window'element thus the page itself needs to have focus.
Because jumanji give per default the tab the focus you have to change it using <tab>. Otherwise the JS doesn't recognize the key pressing and the internal mapping of jumanji react which doesn't find the needed functions thus can't load the hints.

I've thought about integrate VimNav into the hinting-script of jumanji but at the moment I'm working on some other projects which is why I don't have enough time for it.
It would be great if you could integrate VimNav into jumanji.

bernarcher · 2010-07-13 09:32:42

Andrwe wrote:

Because the keys are defined in the JS they are active only for the 'window'-element. This means that the 'window'element thus the page itself needs to have focus.
Because jumanji give per default the tab the focus you have to change it using <tab>. Otherwise the JS doesn't recognize the key pressing and the internal mapping of jumanji react which doesn't find the needed functions thus can't load the hints.

Thank you, Andrwe, this makes the inner workings of jumanji (and webkit) clearer. Unfortunately it is nothing I could do about from inside a user script.

As far as I understand from skimming the jumanji source I could try to provide same named functions jumanji uses to call in the input_hinting_mode script. But it is not clear whether this would work because VimNav needs proper initialization before being able to navigate and the interface might not be compatible enough.

The other - and probably generally useful - way would be another jumanji option (preferably in jumanjirc) where the initial focus could be defaulted to the page instead the associated tab. This would guarantee initialization and independent user scripts use as soon as webkit recognizes the page being loaded.

Any thoughts about this?

bangkok_manouel · 2010-07-13 09:54:09

@neldoreth

what are your plans regarding the single_instance branch? is it going to receive the same love as master? IMO, jumanji should not allow new windows... or please, please, please, make that configurable. thanks

Andrwe · 2010-07-13 10:04:38

@bernarcher
I've already tried to modify VimNav to provide the functions needed by jumanji but that doesn't work because it is written as standalone script.
The only option I can see so far is to rewrite the jumanji script so it provides the same functionality concerning hinting as VimNav. IMO this would be the best way because most of the functions provided by VimNav such as scrolling and so on aren't needed because jumanji already provides them.

Last edited by Andrwe (2010-07-13 10:05:05)

Inxsible · 2010-07-13 12:01:56

neldoreth wrote:

Hello,
karol wrote:
And post a short comment so that folks who install manually are notified about the new version.
So I would nearly have to upgrade the git package everyday and I have to admit, I am too lazy for that and I do not think this makes any sense.
Jumanji is under heavy development right now, so it is better to pull the repository in a while and later on there will be normal versions and when
those occur I will post about it like I did for zathura.
Best regards

Seems fair enough. I can live with that.

Inxsible · 2010-07-13 12:02:44

bangkok_manouel wrote:

@neldoreth
what are your plans regarding the single_instance branch? is it going to receive the same love as master? IMO, jumanji should not allow new windows... or please, please, please, make that configurable. thanks

and I would vote a yes on that as well.

Inxsible · 2010-07-14 00:52:55

Just added a wiki page for jumanji

Please check for errors and correct them as necessary. Also, I haven't added everything to the page, so if you find something that could be useful to others, please add it to the page

karol · 2010-07-14 00:57:50

Edit: Sorry, forgot to update my build.
Carry on.

Last edited by karol (2010-07-14 01:07:31)

bangkok_manouel · 2010-07-14 09:22:41

[drooling]new hinting branch[/drooling]

Andrwe · 2010-07-14 09:35:20

@Inxsible
Does gh,gH,gf and gF work in default configuration or did you set them in your rc?
Because for me these keybindings doesn't work.

karol · 2010-07-14 09:49:36

@ Andrwe
They do in the latest build.

ablepharus · 2010-07-14 10:02:36

I don't know if this is caused by jumanji, but if i open amazon.com my cpu usage goes up to 100% (at just one of the two cores) and jumanji doesn't react anymore.

Andrwe · 2010-07-14 10:23:45

@karol
Just updated and it works, thanks.

I love this browser. The only reason why I also have midori is that jumanji doesn't have session support at the moment.

invalido · 2010-07-14 13:59:13

ablepharus wrote:

I don't know if this is caused by jumanji, but if i open amazon.com my cpu usage goes up to 100% (at just one of the two cores) and jumanji doesn't react anymore.

Same here. One of my three cpu cores goes up to 100% on various pages. Seems like it happens on websites with alot of pictures for me.

Arch Linux

#226 2010-07-13 00:56:25

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#227 2010-07-13 01:03:11

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#228 2010-07-13 01:04:38

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#229 2010-07-13 01:32:09

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#230 2010-07-13 03:24:06

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#231 2010-07-13 06:08:29

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#232 2010-07-13 06:23:18

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#233 2010-07-13 06:40:18

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#234 2010-07-13 06:44:47

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#235 2010-07-13 06:58:13

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#236 2010-07-13 07:20:22

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#237 2010-07-13 08:12:20

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#238 2010-07-13 09:32:42

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#239 2010-07-13 09:54:09

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#240 2010-07-13 10:04:38

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#241 2010-07-13 12:01:56

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#242 2010-07-13 12:02:44

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#243 2010-07-14 00:52:55

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#244 2010-07-14 00:57:50

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#245 2010-07-14 09:22:41

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#246 2010-07-14 09:35:20

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#247 2010-07-14 09:49:36

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#248 2010-07-14 10:02:36

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#249 2010-07-14 10:23:45

Re: jumanji - a web browser

#250 2010-07-14 13:59:13

Re: jumanji - a web browser

Board footer