You are not logged in.
I think this actually is a good idea. We had so many disappointing major updates in the past years (KDE4, Gnome 3 to name the most annoying) that came with so many breakage. It's time for a smooth major version change. By the way: If so many scripts rely on the 2.6.x notation, the kernel will be the most important piece of code that breaks things without actually offering anything new. I think that privilege had to be taken from closed source companies, don't you think?
Offline
I think they should have made the change to 3.0 release scheme when they introduced KMS, I think that was a big change.
The idea is that there ISN'T a big change. It is just a renumbering. The code itself shouldn't "break" anything (like KDE4 and Gnome3 did)... The renumbering might break some scripts though
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
The idea is that there ISN'T a big change. It is just a renumbering. The code itself shouldn't "break" anything (like KDE4 and Gnome3 did)... The renumbering might break some scripts though
As far as I remember when 2.6 kernel was first introduced, they said that it was so advanced they could have named it 3.0. I think they could incorporate the renumbering with a change and my suggestion was KMS, otherwise it might make no sense and why do it now. He has his thought and I have the right to have mine, after all its all about discussion and unfortunatelly the renumbering has already been made, so, lets just embrace it with joy.
Proud Arch Linux user since 2007.
Offline
Heck, I like Donald Knuth's versioning of TeX. It presently at 3.1415926. Future versions converge towards pi.
It really is not a big deal.
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine. -- Alan Turing
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline